Olympus TG-5 vs Panasonic FP2
90 Imaging
38 Features
51 Overall
43
95 Imaging
36 Features
17 Overall
28
Olympus TG-5 vs Panasonic FP2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Boost to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 250g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Launched May 2017
- Superseded the Olympus TG-4
- Updated by Olympus TG-6
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 151g - 99 x 59 x 19mm
- Launched January 2010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-5 vs Panasonic FP2 Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Olympus TG-5 versus Panasonic FP2, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the TG-5 (12MP) and the FP2 (14MP) is relatively comparable and they come with the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-5 was unveiled 7 years after the FP2 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-5 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FP2 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight into a full comparison, below is a quick summary of how the TG-5 grades vs the FP2 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-5 vs Panasonic FP2 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-5 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-5 Gallery & Panasonic FP2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-5 over the Panasonic FP2
| TG-5 | FP2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2017 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 90 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FP2 over the Olympus TG-5
| FP2 | TG-5 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-5 and Panasonic FP2
| TG-5 | FP2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus TG-5 vs Panasonic FP2 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus TG-5 enjoys exterior dimensions of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs) and the Panasonic FP2 has specifications of 99mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-5 versus Panasonic FP2 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the TG-5 versus the FP2.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-5 and FP2 is 90 and 95 respectively.
Olympus TG-5 vs Panasonic FP2 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions just by going through specifications. The pic here may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-5 and FP2.
Plainly, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Panasonic FP2 to provide extra detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The younger TG-5 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-5 vs Panasonic FP2 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus TG-5 vs Panasonic FP2 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-5 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-5 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2 |
| Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2017-05-17 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VIII | Venus Engine IV |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Max boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 20.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.90 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 250 grams (0.55 lbs) | 151 grams (0.33 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 99 x 59 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 pictures | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $449 | $80 |