Olympus TG-5 vs Panasonic FZ28
90 Imaging
37 Features
51 Overall
42
72 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
Olympus TG-5 vs Panasonic FZ28 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Raise to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 250g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Announced May 2017
- Replaced the Olympus TG-4
- Updated by Olympus TG-6
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-486mm (F2.8-4.4) lens
- 417g - 118 x 75 x 89mm
- Revealed January 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-5 vs Panasonic FZ28 Overview
Below is a in depth review of the Olympus TG-5 vs Panasonic FZ28, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the TG-5 (12MP) and the FZ28 (10MP) is fairly similar and both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-5 was introduced 8 years later than the FZ28 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple view of how the TG-5 matches up versus the FZ28 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-5 vs Panasonic FZ28 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-5 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ28. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-5 Gallery & Panasonic FZ28 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-5 over the Panasonic FZ28
| TG-5 | FZ28 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | May 2017 | January 2009 | More recent by 102 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ28 over the Olympus TG-5
| FZ28 | TG-5 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-5 and Panasonic FZ28
| TG-5 | FZ28 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial precise focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-5 vs Panasonic FZ28 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera, you should think about its weight and size. The Olympus TG-5 offers outer dimensions of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ28 has specifications of 118mm x 75mm x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") and a weight of 417 grams (0.92 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-5 vs Panasonic FZ28 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the TG-5 against the FZ28.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the TG-5 and FZ28 is 90 and 72 respectively.
Olympus TG-5 vs Panasonic FZ28 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to envision the difference between sensor measurements just by reviewing a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-5 and FZ28.
As you can see, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Olympus TG-5 to deliver extra detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more modern TG-5 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-5 vs Panasonic FZ28 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus TG-5 vs Panasonic FZ28 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-5 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ28 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-5 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ28 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2017-05-17 | 2009-01-15 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 27-486mm (18.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-4.4 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 20.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 8.50 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill, manual, off | Auto, Red-Eye Auto, On, Red-Eye On, Red-Eye Slow Sync, Off, Slow Sync (1&2) |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 @ 30 fps, 848 x 480, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 @ 30fps, 320 x 240 @ 10fps |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 250 gr (0.55 pounds) | 417 gr (0.92 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 118 x 75 x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 27 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 17.9 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.1 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 79 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 photos | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $449 | $599 |