Olympus TG-5 vs Panasonic ZR1
90 Imaging
38 Features
51 Overall
43
94 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus TG-5 vs Panasonic ZR1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Increase to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 250g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Announced May 2017
- Replaced the Olympus TG-4
- Updated by Olympus TG-6
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 158g - 98 x 55 x 26mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-ZX1
Olympus TG-5 vs Panasonic ZR1 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus TG-5 versus Panasonic ZR1, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the TG-5 (12MP) and the ZR1 (12MP) is relatively similar and both cameras boast the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe TG-5 was released 7 years after the ZR1 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple summation of how the TG-5 scores versus the ZR1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus TG-5 vs Panasonic ZR1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-5 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-5 Gallery & Panasonic ZR1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-5 over the Panasonic ZR1
TG-5 | ZR1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | May 2017 | July 2009 | Newer by 96 months | |
Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZR1 over the Olympus TG-5
ZR1 | TG-5 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-5 and Panasonic ZR1
TG-5 | ZR1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-5 vs Panasonic ZR1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you'll need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-5 features exterior dimensions of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs) while the Panasonic ZR1 has dimensions of 98mm x 55mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-5 versus Panasonic ZR1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the TG-5 versus the ZR1.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the TG-5 and ZR1 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Olympus TG-5 vs Panasonic ZR1 Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions only by reviewing specs. The pic here will offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-5 and ZR1.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same exact megapixels so you can expect similar quality of pictures though you may want to take the launch date of the products into consideration. The more recent TG-5 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-5 vs Panasonic ZR1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-5 vs Panasonic ZR1 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-5 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Tough TG-5 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 |
Also called | - | Lumix DMC-ZX1 |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2017-05-17 | 2009-07-27 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | Venus Engine V |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 25 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 25-200mm (8.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 20.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 5.10 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 250 gr (0.55 lb) | 158 gr (0.35 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 98 x 55 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photographs | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $449 | $280 |