Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital III
90 Imaging
38 Features
51 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc813/fc8134ea9f51e0bc25338134034432ddfb8d8548" alt="Olympus Tough TG-5 front Olympus Tough TG-5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0394/c039434b1259b0983aa2fa353205f299c35090eb" alt="Ricoh GR Digital III front Ricoh GR Digital III front"
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Boost to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 250g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Introduced May 2017
- Older Model is Olympus TG-4
- Newer Model is Olympus TG-6
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Refreshed by Ricoh GR Digital IV
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview
In this article, we are comparing the Olympus TG-5 and Ricoh GR Digital III, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the TG-5 (12MP) and the GR Digital III (10MP) is fairly comparable but the TG-5 (1/2.3") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") feature different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The TG-5 was revealed 7 years after the GR Digital III which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a full comparison, below is a quick view of how the TG-5 scores against the GR Digital III with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-5 and Ricoh GR Digital III. The full galleries are provided at Olympus TG-5 Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-5 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
TG-5 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2017 | ![]() | July 2009 | More modern by 96 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Olympus TG-5
GR Digital III | TG-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-5 and Ricoh GR Digital III
TG-5 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | No Touch display |
Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera often, you will need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-5 has got outer dimensions of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR Digital III has proportions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") and a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-5 and Ricoh GR Digital III in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you select at that time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the TG-5 against the GR Digital III.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c19a8/c19a85d9f6718d3c432e96498a0d1ef2588225fc" alt="Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital III size comparison Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital III size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-5 and GR Digital III is 90 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99b58/99b5822c94a0d17ae1d559e21b8969a23b89fb1f" alt="Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital III top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital III top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to imagine the gap in sensor sizes purely by going through technical specs. The picture below will provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-5 and GR Digital III.
As you have seen, the two cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The TG-5 having a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF more difficult and the Olympus TG-5 will produce greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics far more aggressively. The newer TG-5 should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d8bb6/d8bb6b830346413bf0af0fd838bc500cf3f4cad0" alt="Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital III sensor size comparison Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital III sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8653/b8653a1a306c2d73393741af24736ad999363c92" alt="Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-5 | Ricoh GR Digital III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus Tough TG-5 | Ricoh GR Digital III |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2017-05-17 | 2009-07-27 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | GR engine III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Max enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/1.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 1s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 20.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 250 gr (0.55 lb) | 208 gr (0.46 lb) |
Dimensions | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $449 | $399 |