Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
90 Imaging
37 Features
51 Overall
42
85 Imaging
33 Features
44 Overall
37
Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Bump to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 250g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Launched May 2017
- Replaced the Olympus TG-4
- Successor is Olympus TG-6
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Released March 2010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview
Below is a in-depth overview of the Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the TG-5 (12MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) is pretty similar but the TG-5 (1/2.3") and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") use totally different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-5 was brought out 7 years later than the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-5 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving in to a thorough comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the TG-5 matches up versus the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-5 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-5 Gallery and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-5 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
| TG-5 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2017 |  | March 2010 | More recent by 88 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Olympus TG-5
| GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | TG-5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-5 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
| TG-5 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus TG-5 comes with outer measurements of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has specifications of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select at that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the TG-5 and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-5 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 90 and 85 respectively.
Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to visualise the difference between sensor measurements merely by reading specifications. The visual here will provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-5 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Plainly, both of these cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The TG-5 because of its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field harder and the Olympus TG-5 will offer you more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs far more aggressively. The younger TG-5 is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-5 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-5 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
| Type | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2017-05-17 | 2010-03-18 |
| Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.5-4.4 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 180s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 20.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 250 grams (0.55 pounds) | 355 grams (0.78 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 photos | 410 photos |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $449 | $349 |