Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS
90 Imaging
38 Features
51 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc813/fc8134ea9f51e0bc25338134034432ddfb8d8548" alt="Olympus Tough TG-5 front Olympus Tough TG-5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a155e/a155e32ab76bd18f46a3b00fd477c4639517dbc2" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS front Ricoh WG-5 GPS front"
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Push to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 250g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Released May 2017
- Previous Model is Olympus TG-4
- Newer Model is Olympus TG-6
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Announced February 2015
- Superseded the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Updated by Ricoh WG-6
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Olympus TG-5 versus Ricoh WG-5 GPS, both Waterproof digital cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a significant gap between the image resolutions of the TG-5 (12MP) and WG-5 GPS (16MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The TG-5 was revealed 2 years after the WG-5 GPS which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a complete comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the TG-5 scores vs the WG-5 GPS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-5 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-5 Gallery and Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-5 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
TG-5 | WG-5 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | May 2017 | ![]() | February 2015 | Newer by 28 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Olympus TG-5
WG-5 GPS | TG-5 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-5 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
TG-5 | WG-5 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurements |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-5 has got exterior dimensions of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has proportions of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-5 versus Ricoh WG-5 GPS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the TG-5 versus the WG-5 GPS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/285d5/285d5ac55a622978cc91c79029bf272a060cef5f" alt="Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS size comparison Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-5 and WG-5 GPS is 90 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e589/6e58980cf0a2951c1eed0a0b87018d3660258a05" alt="Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to envision the difference between sensor dimensions simply by going over specs. The image below may give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-5 and WG-5 GPS.
All in all, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to offer you more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos way more aggressively. The newer TG-5 will have an edge in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/02dc5/02dc5fc2d59eb94258d2fb5c3bc60ec679cbe9c7" alt="Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS sensor size comparison Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04d3b/04d3b714e2562fb53f3e95cd282ce694c4b2c8e0" alt="Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-5 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus Tough TG-5 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS |
Category | Waterproof | Waterproof |
Released | 2017-05-17 | 2015-02-10 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 20.0fps | 14.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill, manual, off | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 250 gr (0.55 pounds) | 236 gr (0.52 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 pictures | 240 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-92B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $449 | $500 |