Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh WG-70
90 Imaging
38 Features
51 Overall
43
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Raise to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 250g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Introduced May 2017
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-4
- Newer Model is Olympus TG-6
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed February 2020
- Later Model is Ricoh WG-80
Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Olympus TG-5 versus Ricoh WG-70, both Waterproof cameras by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the TG-5 (12MP) and WG-70 (16MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-5 was introduced 3 years prior to the WG-70 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the TG-5 grades against the WG-70 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh WG-70 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-5 & Ricoh WG-70. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-5 Gallery & Ricoh WG-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-5 over the Ricoh WG-70
TG-5 | WG-70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Olympus TG-5
WG-70 | TG-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2020 | May 2017 | Newer by 33 months |
Common features in the Olympus TG-5 and Ricoh WG-70
TG-5 | WG-70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither features Touch screen |
Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus TG-5 enjoys outer measurements of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-70 has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-5 versus Ricoh WG-70 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at the time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the TG-5 vs the WG-70.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-5 and WG-70 is 90 and 91 respectively.
Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions simply by seeing technical specs. The image here will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-5 and WG-70.
As you have seen, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Ricoh WG-70 to produce extra detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged TG-5 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-5 | Ricoh WG-70 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus Tough TG-5 | Ricoh WG-70 |
Class | Waterproof | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2017-05-17 | 2020-02-04 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Max boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 20.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill, manual, off | On, off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Yes (Wireless) |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 250 gr (0.55 pounds) | 193 gr (0.43 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 images | 300 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-92B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $449 | $280 |