Olympus TG-5 vs Samsung NX300
90 Imaging
38 Features
51 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc813/fc8134ea9f51e0bc25338134034432ddfb8d8548" alt="Olympus Tough TG-5 front Olympus Tough TG-5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cfd15/cfd1574284728cc1e5386b2100b5855f4273a852" alt="Samsung NX300 front Samsung NX300 front"
86 Imaging
63 Features
73 Overall
67
Olympus TG-5 vs Samsung NX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Raise to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 250g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Launched May 2017
- Replaced the Olympus TG-4
- Later Model is Olympus TG-6
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Revealed November 2013
- Older Model is Samsung NX210
- Refreshed by Samsung NX500
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus TG-5 vs Samsung NX300 Overview
Here is a extended analysis of the Olympus TG-5 vs Samsung NX300, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the TG-5 (12MP) and NX300 (20MP) and the TG-5 (1/2.3") and NX300 (APS-C) provide totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The TG-5 was launched 3 years later than the NX300 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-5 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise summary of how the TG-5 grades versus the NX300 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus TG-5 vs Samsung NX300 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-5 and Samsung NX300. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus TG-5 Gallery and Samsung NX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-5 over the Samsung NX300
TG-5 | NX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2017 | ![]() | November 2013 | Fresher by 43 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300 over the Olympus TG-5
NX300 | TG-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimensions | 3.3" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 768k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+308k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-5 and Samsung NX300
TG-5 | NX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus TG-5 vs Samsung NX300 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera often, you're going to have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus TG-5 has got external dimensions of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs) while the Samsung NX300 has specifications of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") and a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-5 vs Samsung NX300 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the TG-5 against the NX300.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b87b/5b87bc2a9e98350df177ee1cd4eb4e975e0f7564" alt="Olympus TG-5 vs Samsung NX300 size comparison Olympus TG-5 vs Samsung NX300 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-5 and NX300 is 90 and 86 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/39330/393302bbb75a32c789ec711e18a4aa489b956bc6" alt="Olympus TG-5 vs Samsung NX300 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-5 vs Samsung NX300 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-5 vs Samsung NX300 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to envision the gap in sensor sizing merely by seeing specifications. The graphic below may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-5 and NX300.
To sum up, the 2 cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The TG-5 featuring a smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh more difficult and the Samsung NX300 will produce extra detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The younger TG-5 will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/83235/832355b4e53872a9434fb278d1f7a3e1805472ec" alt="Olympus TG-5 vs Samsung NX300 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-5 vs Samsung NX300 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-5 vs Samsung NX300 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ed572/ed572f69e4845fa1c71e93796dac55de059dde06" alt="Olympus TG-5 vs Samsung NX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-5 vs Samsung NX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus TG-5 vs Samsung NX300 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-5 | Samsung NX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus Tough TG-5 | Samsung NX300 |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2017-05-17 | 2013-11-24 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | DRIMe IV |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | 247 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3" | 3.3" |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 768 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/6000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 20.0 frames/s | 9.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 250 gr (0.55 lbs) | 331 gr (0.73 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 76 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 942 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 shots | 330 shots |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-92B | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $449 | $750 |