Olympus TG-5 vs Samsung SL202
90 Imaging
38 Features
51 Overall
43
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Olympus TG-5 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Expand to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 250g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Released May 2017
- Replaced the Olympus TG-4
- Replacement is Olympus TG-6
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Additionally referred to as PL50
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-5 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Olympus TG-5 versus Samsung SL202, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the TG-5 (12MP) and the SL202 (10MP) is fairly comparable and they come with the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe TG-5 was manufactured 8 years after the SL202 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the TG-5 matches up vs the SL202 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-5 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-5 & Samsung SL202. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-5 Gallery & Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-5 over the Samsung SL202
| TG-5 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2017 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 101 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Olympus TG-5
| SL202 | TG-5 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-5 and Samsung SL202
| TG-5 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither offers Touch display |
Olympus TG-5 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera, you are going to need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-5 offers exterior measurements of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL202 has measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-5 versus Samsung SL202 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the TG-5 against the SL202.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-5 and SL202 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Olympus TG-5 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to envision the gap in sensor dimensions just by checking out specifications. The image below will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-5 and SL202.
Plainly, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Olympus TG-5 to provide extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The younger TG-5 is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-5 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus TG-5 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-5 | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-5 | Samsung SL202 |
| Otherwise known as | - | PL50 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2017-05-17 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 20.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 250 grams (0.55 lbs) | 168 grams (0.37 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 photographs | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $449 | $140 |