Olympus TG-5 vs Samsung WB35F
90 Imaging
37 Features
51 Overall
42
93 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
Olympus TG-5 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Bump to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 250g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Revealed May 2017
- Previous Model is Olympus TG-4
- Successor is Olympus TG-6
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus TG-5 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Below is a detailed review of the Olympus TG-5 versus Samsung WB35F, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the TG-5 (12MP) and WB35F (16MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-5 was unveiled 3 years later than the WB35F and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick summation of how the TG-5 matches up vs the WB35F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-5 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-5 & Samsung WB35F. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-5 Gallery & Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-5 over the Samsung WB35F
| TG-5 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | May 2017 |  | January 2014 | More recent by 41 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Olympus TG-5
| WB35F | TG-5 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-5 and Samsung WB35F
| TG-5 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither has Touch display |
Olympus TG-5 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-5 has outer measurements of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB35F has measurements of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-5 versus Samsung WB35F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at that moment. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the TG-5 against the WB35F.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-5 and WB35F is 90 and 93 respectively.
Olympus TG-5 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to visualize the gap between sensor measurements simply by looking at specifications. The graphic here may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-5 and WB35F.
To sum up, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but different resolution. You can expect to see the Samsung WB35F to resolve greater detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics way more aggressively. The more recent TG-5 provides an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-5 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus TG-5 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-5 | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-5 | Samsung WB35F |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2017-05-17 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 20.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill, manual, off | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 250g (0.55 lbs) | 194g (0.43 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 photographs | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-92B | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $449 | $130 |