Olympus TG-5 vs Sigma SD9
90 Imaging
37 Features
51 Overall
42
54 Imaging
38 Features
27 Overall
33
Olympus TG-5 vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Increase to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 250g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Revealed May 2017
- Replaced the Olympus TG-4
- Renewed by Olympus TG-6
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Announced November 2002
- Successor is Sigma SD10
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-5 vs Sigma SD9 Overview
Following is a complete assessment of the Olympus TG-5 versus Sigma SD9, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sigma. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the TG-5 (12MP) and SD9 (3MP) and the TG-5 (1/2.3") and SD9 (APS-C) offer different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-5 was manufactured 14 years after the SD9 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-5 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going right into a detailed comparison, here is a short view of how the TG-5 matches up versus the SD9 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-5 vs Sigma SD9 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-5 & Sigma SD9. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-5 Gallery & Sigma SD9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-5 over the Sigma SD9
| TG-5 | SD9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2017 |  | November 2002 | More modern by 177 months |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 130k | Sharper screen (+330k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Olympus TG-5
| SD9 | TG-5 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-5 and Sigma SD9
| TG-5 | SD9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-5 vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-5 has outer dimensions of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs) while the Sigma SD9 has dimensions of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") accompanied by a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-5 versus Sigma SD9 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the TG-5 vs the SD9.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-5 and SD9 is 90 and 54 respectively.
Olympus TG-5 vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes purely by looking through specs. The image here might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-5 and SD9.
All in all, both of those cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The TG-5 due to its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult and the Olympus TG-5 will result in extra detail due to its extra 9 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs way more aggressively. The younger TG-5 should have an edge in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-5 vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus TG-5 vs Sigma SD9 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-5 | Sigma SD9 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-5 | Sigma SD9 |
| Category | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Revealed | 2017-05-17 | 2002-11-26 |
| Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 3 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 2268 x 1512 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 400 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 76 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 1.8" |
| Resolution of display | 460k dot | 130k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 98 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 20.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill, manual, off | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | None |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 250 gr (0.55 lb) | 950 gr (2.09 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 pictures | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | Compact Flash Type I or II |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $449 | $3,001 |