Olympus TG-5 vs Sony W320
90 Imaging
38 Features
51 Overall
43
97 Imaging
37 Features
21 Overall
30
Olympus TG-5 vs Sony W320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Boost to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 250g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Announced May 2017
- Superseded the Olympus TG-4
- New Model is Olympus TG-6
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
- Launched January 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-5 vs Sony W320 Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Olympus TG-5 vs Sony W320, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the TG-5 (12MP) and the W320 (14MP) is fairly similar and they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-5 was announced 7 years later than the W320 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-5 being a Compact camera and the Sony W320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the TG-5 scores vs the W320 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-5 vs Sony W320 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-5 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-5 Gallery and Sony W320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-5 over the Sony W320
| TG-5 | W320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2017 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 90 months |
| Manual focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Olympus TG-5
| W320 | TG-5 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-5 and Sony W320
| TG-5 | W320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-5 vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-5 enjoys physical dimensions of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs) and the Sony W320 has sizing of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-5 vs Sony W320 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the TG-5 against the W320.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the TG-5 and W320 is 90 and 97 respectively.
Olympus TG-5 vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to picture the difference between sensor sizing simply by going over a spec sheet. The visual here might give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-5 and W320.
Clearly, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You should anticipate the Sony W320 to offer you extra detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos much more aggressively. The more recent TG-5 provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-5 vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus TG-5 vs Sony W320 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-5 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-5 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 |
| Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2017-05-17 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VIII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.7-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 4cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 20.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 250 gr (0.55 lb) | 117 gr (0.26 lb) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 photographs | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $449 | $269 |
