Olympus TG-6 vs Olympus VG-160
90 Imaging
39 Features
54 Overall
45
96 Imaging
38 Features
26 Overall
33
Olympus TG-6 vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 253g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Launched May 2019
- Earlier Model is Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2012
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Olympus TG-6 vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
In this article, we will be analyzing the Olympus TG-6 and Olympus VG-160, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are manufactured by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the TG-6 (12MP) and the VG-160 (14MP) is relatively comparable and they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-6 was manufactured 7 years after the VG-160 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short introduction of how the TG-6 grades vs the VG-160 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-6 vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-6 and Olympus VG-160. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-6 Gallery and Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-6 over the Olympus VG-160
| TG-6 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | May 2019 |  | January 2012 | More modern by 90 months |
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+810k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Olympus TG-6
| VG-160 | TG-6 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-6 and Olympus VG-160
| TG-6 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Olympus TG-6 vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-6 provides physical measurements of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 253 grams (0.56 lbs) and the Olympus VG-160 has proportions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-6 and Olympus VG-160 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have at that moment. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the TG-6 and the VG-160.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-6 and VG-160 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Olympus TG-6 vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to see the difference in sensor sizes simply by seeing technical specs. The image here may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-6 and VG-160.
As you can tell, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Olympus VG-160 to produce extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more modern TG-6 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-6 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus TG-6 vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-6 | Olympus VG-160 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-6 | Olympus VG-160 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2019-05-22 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 7cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 20.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Red Eye Reduction, Slow sync. (1st curtain), Red-eye Slow sync. (1st curtain), Fill- in, Manual, Flash Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PC | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 253g (0.56 pounds) | 125g (0.28 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 images | 165 images |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I support) | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $449 | $90 |
