Clicky

Olympus TG-6 vs Olympus VR-320

Portability
90 Imaging
38 Features
54 Overall
44
Olympus Tough TG-6 front
 
Olympus VR-320 front
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36

Olympus TG-6 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs

Olympus TG-6
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 253g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
  • Launched May 2019
  • Old Model is Olympus TG-5
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Revealed July 2011
  • Later Model is Olympus VR-330
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus TG-6 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview

Following is a in-depth overview of the Olympus TG-6 vs Olympus VR-320, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are produced by Olympus. The image resolution of the TG-6 (12MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The TG-6 was introduced 7 years after the VR-320 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a brief summary of how the TG-6 scores vs the VR-320 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide 

        

          

            
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-6 over the Olympus VR-320

          

          

            
 TG-6 VR-320 
RevealedMay 2019July 2011More modern by 96 months
Manual focus  Dial accurate focus
Display resolution1040k230kSharper display (+810k dot)
          

        


        

          

            
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Olympus TG-6

          

          

            
 VR-320 TG-6 
          

        


        

          

            
Common features in the Olympus TG-6 and Olympus VR-320

          

          

            
 TG-6 VR-320 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size3"3"Same display dimensions
Selfie screen  Neither contains selfie screen
Touch display  Neither contains Touch display
          

        

        

	
	
	
	

        

          

            
Olympus TG-6 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison

          

          

            
If you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-6 has got external measurements of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 253 grams (0.56 lbs) and the Olympus VR-320 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-6 vs Olympus VR-320 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select during that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the TG-6 versus the VR-320.
Olympus TG-6 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-6 and VR-320 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Olympus TG-6 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison          

        


        

          

            
Olympus TG-6 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison

          

          

            
More often than not, it is hard to see the difference in sensor sizes only by checking out specifications. The pic below may give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-6 and VR-320.
Plainly, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Olympus VR-320 to produce greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos way more aggressively. The fresher TG-6 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.

            Olympus TG-6 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison
          

        


        

          

            
Olympus TG-6 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder

          

          

                      

          Olympus TG-6 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison        


                President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban        

	
	
	
	

        

          
Photography Type Scores

          

        

        
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-6 Portrait photography details
Olympus VR-320 Portrait photography details
39
 you can focus manually
 offers face detection autofocus
 exports RAW files
 no manual control
 cannot use external flash
 sensor resolution low (12MP)
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
33
 good megapixels (14MP)
 comes with face detection focusing
 focusing manually not possible
 lack of manual exposure
 can't use external flash
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 has no RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Street Comparison
Olympus TG-6 Street photography highlights
Olympus VR-320 Street photography highlights
64
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 exports RAW files
 environment sealing
 fixed screen
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 more heavy than average (253 grams)
62
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than competition in class (158g)
 no articulating screen
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 has no RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Sports Comparison
Sports photography with Olympus TG-6
Sports photography with Olympus VR-320
46
 max fps high (20.0 frames per second)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 offers tracking autofocus
 environment sealing
 great battery power (340 per charge)
 lack of shutter priority mode
 sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 has no phase detect autofocus
47
 long zoom range (24-300mm  12.5 x zoom)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 good megapixels (14MP)
 comes with tracking autofocus
 no shutter priority
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 has no phase detect AF
Photography Glossary
Travel Comparison
Olympus TG-6 Travel photography advice
Olympus VR-320 Travel photography advice
68
 great battery power (340 CIPA)
 environment sealing
 flash built-in
 quite wide (25mm)
 very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
 more heavy than average (253 grams)
 sensor resolution low (12MP)
 display isn't selfie friendly
70
 lighter than competition in class (158g)
 good megapixels (14MP)
 flash built-in
 quite wide (24mm)
 long zoom (300mm)
 lack of Timelapse function
 doesn't offer selfie friendly display
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Landscape Comparison
Olympus TG-6 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus VR-320 Landscape photography highlights
57
 you can focus manually
 quite wide (25mm)
 very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
 pretty good screen size (3")
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 exports RAW files
 environment sealing
 great battery power (340 per charge)
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 no manual control
 sensor resolution low (12MP)
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
42
 quite wide (24mm)
 nice screen size (3 inches)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 good megapixels (14MP)
 focusing manually not possible
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
 lack of manual exposure
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 has no RAW support
 lack of Timelapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-6 Vlogging highlights
Olympus VR-320 Vlogging highlights
34
 quite wide (25mm)
 very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 offers face detection autofocus
 high res video (3840 x 2160 pixels)
 display isn't selfie friendly
 does not have external microphone port
 more heavy than average (253g)
32
 quite wide (24mm)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 comes with face detection focusing
 lighter than competition in class (158 grams)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
 doesn't offer selfie friendly display
 low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
 lack of external microphone socket
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
        
                
        

          

            
Olympus TG-6 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications

          

          

                      


          

            Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-6 and Olympus VR-320
 Olympus Tough TG-6Olympus VR-320
General Information
Company Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus Tough TG-6 Olympus VR-320
Class Waterproof Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2019-05-22 2011-07-19
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VIII TruePic III
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter    
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 4:3
Maximum resolution 4000 x 3000 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 12800 1600
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW data    
Autofocusing
Manual focus    
AF touch    
AF continuous    
AF single    
AF tracking    
Selective AF    
AF center weighted    
Multi area AF    
AF live view    
Face detect focusing    
Contract detect focusing    
Phase detect focusing    
Number of focus points 25 -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-100mm (4.0x) 24-300mm (12.5x)
Largest aperture f/2.0-4.9 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focus distance 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 1,040 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch function    
Display tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 4 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 20.0fps -
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manual mode    
Custom WB    
Image stabilization    
Integrated flash    
Flash range - 4.70 m
Flash modes Auto, Red Eye Reduction, Slow sync. (1st curtain), Red-eye Slow sync. (1st curtain), Fill- in, Manual, Flash Off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe    
AE bracketing    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment exposure    
Average exposure    
Spot exposure    
Partial exposure    
AF area exposure    
Center weighted exposure    
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PC 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Maximum video resolution 3840x2160 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone port    
Headphone port    
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Built-in None
Physical
Environmental sealing    
Water proof    
Dust proof    
Shock proof    
Crush proof    
Freeze proof    
Weight 253g (0.56 lb) 158g (0.35 lb)
Physical dimensions 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 340 pictures -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery model LI-92B LI-42B
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording    
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I support) SD/SDHC
Card slots 1 1
Retail price $449 $179