Olympus TG-6 vs Panasonic FS42
90 Imaging
39 Features
54 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ffd7f/ffd7f68f44b62cc6692afbe8663d94e19abfcd45" alt="Olympus Tough TG-6 front Olympus Tough TG-6 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9979/f9979d6158b07faa33963a04f4938253f5f9ce99" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front"
95 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
Olympus TG-6 vs Panasonic FS42 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 253g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Launched May 2019
- Superseded the Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000 (Push to 6400)
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
- Released April 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus TG-6 vs Panasonic FS42 Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Olympus TG-6 versus Panasonic FS42, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the TG-6 (12MP) and the FS42 (10MP) is relatively similar but the TG-6 (1/2.3") and FS42 (1/2.5") offer totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The TG-6 was announced 10 years after the FS42 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-6 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FS42 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the TG-6 grades versus the FS42 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus TG-6 vs Panasonic FS42 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-6 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-6 Gallery and Panasonic FS42 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-6 over the Panasonic FS42
TG-6 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2019 | ![]() | April 2009 | More modern by 123 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Olympus TG-6
FS42 | TG-6 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-6 and Panasonic FS42
TG-6 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-6 vs Panasonic FS42 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-6 enjoys exterior measurements of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 253 grams (0.56 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FS42 has dimensions of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-6 versus Panasonic FS42 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the TG-6 versus the FS42.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31a53/31a5385c51809b493b340c1166d5b4dbd90a6364" alt="Olympus TG-6 vs Panasonic FS42 size comparison Olympus TG-6 vs Panasonic FS42 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-6 and FS42 is 90 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4218/d4218be91f11877285056a6fc3db200b54fcf055" alt="Olympus TG-6 vs Panasonic FS42 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-6 vs Panasonic FS42 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-6 vs Panasonic FS42 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to envision the gap between sensor sizes merely by going over specs. The pic here might give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-6 and FS42.
All in all, both of those cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The TG-6 having a bigger sensor will make achieving bokeh easier and the Olympus TG-6 will offer you extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more modern TG-6 will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cb593/cb593b8cf42ba583f34fd7d85c2d348c935c092a" alt="Olympus TG-6 vs Panasonic FS42 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-6 vs Panasonic FS42 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-6 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c113/4c11348a03e5c50353805386acc5b8c673857ca0" alt="Olympus TG-6 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-6 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus TG-6 vs Panasonic FS42 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-6 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Tough TG-6 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 |
Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2019-05-22 | 2009-04-17 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 1000 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 20.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 6.30 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Red Eye Reduction, Slow sync. (1st curtain), Red-eye Slow sync. (1st curtain), Fill- in, Manual, Flash Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PC | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 253 grams (0.56 lb) | 132 grams (0.29 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photos | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I support) | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $449 | $580 |