Olympus TG-6 vs Panasonic FZ1000
90 Imaging
39 Features
54 Overall
45
55 Imaging
51 Features
80 Overall
62
Olympus TG-6 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 253g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Announced May 2019
- Replaced the Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-400mm (F2.8-4.0) lens
- 831g - 137 x 99 x 131mm
- Announced June 2014
- Replacement is Panasonic FZ2500
Olympus TG-6 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Olympus TG-6 vs Panasonic FZ1000, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the TG-6 (12MP) and FZ1000 (20MP) and the TG-6 (1/2.3") and FZ1000 (1") use totally different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-6 was released 5 years later than the FZ1000 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-6 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ1000 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting straight into a in depth comparison, below is a short summation of how the TG-6 matches up versus the FZ1000 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus TG-6 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-6 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000. The complete galleries are available at Olympus TG-6 Gallery and Panasonic FZ1000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-6 over the Panasonic FZ1000
TG-6 | FZ1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | May 2019 | June 2014 | More recent by 61 months | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 921k | Sharper screen (+119k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ1000 over the Olympus TG-6
FZ1000 | TG-6 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus TG-6 and Panasonic FZ1000
TG-6 | FZ1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurements | |
Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-6 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-6 has got external measurements of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 253 grams (0.56 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ1000 has measurements of 137mm x 99mm x 131mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 5.2") with a weight of 831 grams (1.83 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-6 vs Panasonic FZ1000 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the TG-6 and the FZ1000.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the TG-6 and FZ1000 is 90 and 55 respectively.
Olympus TG-6 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to visualise the gap between sensor measurements just by reading specs. The graphic underneath might give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-6 and FZ1000.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The TG-6 because of its tinier sensor will make shooting bokeh more difficult and the Panasonic FZ1000 will offer you more detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The younger TG-6 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-6 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-6 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-6 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Tough TG-6 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 |
Type | Waterproof | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2019-05-22 | 2014-06-12 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 25 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 25-400mm (16.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-4.0 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 20.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 13.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, Red Eye Reduction, Slow sync. (1st curtain), Red-eye Slow sync. (1st curtain), Fill- in, Manual, Flash Off | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PC | 3840x2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p) 1280x720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 253g (0.56 lb) | 831g (1.83 lb) |
Dimensions | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 137 x 99 x 131mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 5.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 64 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 517 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photos | 360 photos |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-92B | DMW-BLC12PP |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I support) | - |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $449 | $800 |