Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
90 Imaging
39 Features
54 Overall
45
85 Imaging
33 Features
48 Overall
39
Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 253g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Revealed May 2019
- Replaced the Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 367g - 114 x 58 x 50mm
- Released August 2010
Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Overview
Here is a thorough review of the Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the TG-6 (12MP) and the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC (10MP) is fairly similar and they feature the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe TG-6 was manufactured 8 years later than the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-6 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the TG-6 matches up versus the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-6 and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-6 Gallery and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-6 over the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
TG-6 | GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2019 | August 2010 | Fresher by 108 months | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 920k | Crisper display (+120k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC over the Olympus TG-6
GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | TG-6 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-6 and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
TG-6 | GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither comes with Touch display |
Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-6 comes with exterior dimensions of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 253 grams (0.56 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC has dimensions of 114mm x 58mm x 50mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 367 grams (0.81 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the TG-6 compared to the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-6 and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC is 90 and 85 respectively.
Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizing merely by going over technical specs. The visual underneath might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-6 and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC.
As you can tell, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Olympus TG-6 to offer greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images far more aggressively. The more recent TG-6 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-6 | Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus Tough TG-6 | Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC |
Category | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2019-05-22 | 2010-08-06 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 20.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Red Eye Reduction, Slow sync. (1st curtain), Red-eye Slow sync. (1st curtain), Fill- in, Manual, Flash Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PC | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 253 grams (0.56 lbs) | 367 grams (0.81 lbs) |
Dimensions | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 114 x 58 x 50mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 pictures | 440 pictures |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I support) | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $449 | $147 |