Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS
90 Imaging
39 Features
54 Overall
45
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 253g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Announced May 2019
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Superseded the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- New Model is Ricoh WG-6
Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview
Below is a thorough assessment of the Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS, both Waterproof digital cameras by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the TG-6 (12MP) and WG-5 GPS (16MP) but they come with the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe TG-6 was unveiled 4 years later than the WG-5 GPS and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the TG-6 grades vs the WG-5 GPS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-6 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS. The full galleries are provided at Olympus TG-6 Gallery and Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-6 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
TG-6 | WG-5 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | May 2019 | February 2015 | More recent by 53 months | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 460k | Sharper screen (+580k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Olympus TG-6
WG-5 GPS | TG-6 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-6 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
TG-6 | WG-5 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and size. The Olympus TG-6 has outer measurements of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 253 grams (0.56 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has specifications of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the TG-6 versus the WG-5 GPS.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-6 and WG-5 GPS is 90 and 90 respectively.
Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to visualise the difference between sensor measurements simply by going over specs. The photograph below will help give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-6 and WG-5 GPS.
All in all, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to offer you more detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The newer TG-6 is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-6 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus Tough TG-6 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS |
Type | Waterproof | Waterproof |
Announced | 2019-05-22 | 2015-02-10 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 25 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 20.0 frames/s | 14.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, Red Eye Reduction, Slow sync. (1st curtain), Red-eye Slow sync. (1st curtain), Fill- in, Manual, Flash Off | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PC | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 253g (0.56 lb) | 236g (0.52 lb) |
Dimensions | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photos | 240 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-92B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I support) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $449 | $500 |