Olympus TG-6 vs Samsung SL202
90 Imaging
38 Features
54 Overall
44
94 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
Olympus TG-6 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 253g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Launched May 2019
- Older Model is Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Alternative Name is PL50
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-6 vs. Samsung SL202: A Deep Dive into Two Compact Camera Contenders
Choosing the right compact camera can be daunting, especially when two models straddle different design philosophies and user bases. Today, we compare the Olympus Tough TG-6 and the Samsung SL202, two fixed-lens compact cameras with distinct strengths tailored to diverse photographic pursuits. Whether you want rugged outdoor performance or straightforward point-and-shoot capabilities, understanding their differences helps you align your camera choice with your creative needs.
Drawing on extensive hands-on testing and industry benchmarks, this comparison explores technical specs, image quality, handling, and suitability across photography genres. Let’s unravel what each camera brings to the table and help you make a confident acquisition.
First Impressions: Size, Handling, and Ergonomics
How a camera feels in your hands can strongly influence your shooting experience - comfort, accessibility of controls, and portability all matter quite a bit in real-world use.

-
Olympus TG-6: At 113 x 66 x 32 mm and 253 g, it’s solidly built with a bulkier footprint. The TG-6’s robust construction includes extensive environmental sealing, making it rugged and suitable for adventurous shooting scenarios. Its grip and button layout cater to quick access even with gloves.
-
Samsung SL202: Smaller and lighter at 92 x 61 x 23 mm and 168 g, this camera is designed for easy pocketability and casual carry. Its slim profile means it's less obtrusive in street and travel photography but offers fewer tactile controls.
Ergonomics Insight: The TG-6’s size reflects its reinforced body - a tradeoff favoring durability over ultimate compactness. For photographers seeking a durable companion for rough environments, this added heft is a worthwhile compromise. Conversely, for everyday convenience and subtlety, the SL202’s lighter design excels.
Design and Control Layout
Intuitive access to exposure controls and settings streamlines your workflow, letting you focus more on creativity.

-
TG-6: Features dedicated buttons for aperture priority exposure mode and multiple flash options, vital for creative control indoors or underwater. While lacking a touchscreen, physical buttons deliver reliable tactile feedback even in wet or cold conditions.
-
SL202: Minimalist button design reflects its entry-level status. It lacks manual exposure modes and offers only basic control, limiting experimentation. The non-touchscreen LCD and absence of dedicated physical controls make changing settings less flexible.
Control Takeaway: The TG-6 is purpose-built for photographers who want some manual input without fuss, especially outdoors. The SL202 suits users preferring fully automatic shooting in well-lit, relaxed settings.
Sensor and Image Quality: Bridging Technology and Results
Despite both cameras using the common 1/2.3" sensor size, their sensor technologies differ, influencing image quality significantly.

| Feature | Olympus TG-6 | Samsung SL202 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Resolution | 12 MP (4000x3000) | 10 MP (3648x2736) |
| Sensor Dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55 mm (28.07 mm²) | 6.08 x 4.56 mm (27.72 mm²) |
| ISO Range | 100 - 12800 | 80 - 1600 |
| AA Filter | Yes | Yes |
| RAW Support | Yes | No |
Real-World Impact:
-
Olympus TG-6 uses a back-illuminated CMOS sensor (BSI-CMOS), offering superior sensitivity and better noise control at high ISO. The extended ISO range up to 12800, though practically usable around ISO 3200-6400, means enhanced low-light flexibility - key for night photography and indoor shooting without flash.
-
Samsung SL202 relies on an older CCD sensor with limited ISO headroom, peaking at ISO 1600. CCDs excel at color fidelity in bright conditions but falter in low light, showing noise and less sharpness. Lack of RAW output limits post-processing potential.
Testing confirms that in daylight, both cameras deliver decent images suitable for casual use. However, TG-6 produces more detailed shots with better dynamic range and retains color accuracy at higher ISO. The SL202 is best confined to well-lit scenes or daylight casual snaps.
Rear Display and User Interface
A clear, responsive screen helps frame your shots and review results efficiently.

| Feature | Olympus TG-6 | Samsung SL202 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 3.0" | 2.7" |
| Resolution (pixels) | 1040k | 230k |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Fixed Screen | Yes | Yes |
The TG-6’s significantly higher resolution screen facilitates more accurate previewing of focus and image details on the spot. This is essential for quick evaluation in the field, especially under varied lighting. The SL202’s lower resolution screen can feel dated and limits your ability to inspect critical focus and noise.
Lens and Focusing Performance: What’s Your Subject?
Both cameras come equipped with fixed zoom lenses and have macro capabilities - key for varying shooting styles.
| Feature | Olympus TG-6 | Samsung SL202 |
|---|---|---|
| Focal Length (35mm equiv.) | 25-100 mm (4x zoom) | 28-102 mm (3.6x zoom) |
| Max Aperture Range | f/2.0 - f/4.9 | f/2.8 - f/5.7 |
| Macro Focus Range | As close as 1 cm | As close as 5 cm |
| Image Stabilization | Sensor-shift (IS) | None |
| Autofocus Points | 25 contrast-detect points | Unknown (contrast-based) |
| AF Modes | Single, Continuous, Tracking | Single AF only |
Insights:
-
The TG-6’s lens is notably brighter at wide-angle (f/2.0), allowing better background separation and use in lower light. The 1 cm macro focusing pushes it into serious close-up range, making it highly capable for nature and detail shots.
-
The SL202’s lens starts a stop darker (f/2.8), limiting light intake and bokeh potential. Its macro mode only reaches 5 cm, which is decent but less versatile for micro photography.
-
TG-6 features sensor-shift stabilization that helps hold sharpness at slower shutter speeds - valuable in handheld shooting without a tripod. The SL202 lacks image stabilization, thereby relying on faster shutter speeds to avoid blur.
-
Autofocus performance on the TG-6 is markedly superior, with tracking ability and quick, precise focus acquisition, even in challenging light. The SL202’s focus is basic and slower, often hunting in low contrast scenes.
Durability and Environmental Sealing
If you shoot outdoors, at the beach, underwater, or in dusty or rugged environments, durability is non-negotiable.
| Feature | Olympus TG-6 | Samsung SL202 |
|---|---|---|
| Waterproof | Yes, up to 15 m (50 ft) | No |
| Shockproof | Yes, drops from 2.1 m | No |
| Freezeproof | Yes, down to -10°C | No |
| Dustproof | Yes | No |
| Crushproof | Yes, up to 100 kg | No |
The Olympus TG-6 is specifically engineered for tough conditions, earning its “Tough” label. This opens creative possibilities like underwater macro, snowy landscapes, and adventure travel without extra housing or cases. For active photographers who need a camera that passes stringent durability tests, TG-6 is the standout.
By contrast, the Samsung SL202 is a conventional compact designed for casual, controlled environments.
Photography Across Genres: Which Camera Excels?
Let’s examine how these cameras perform in various photographic disciplines you may pursue.
Portraiture
-
TG-6 offers a brighter lens allowing attractive subject-background separation and gentle bokeh at 25 mm f/2.0. Its face detection autofocus enhances sharp eye capture. RAW support permits precise skin tone adjustments.
-
SL202 has a slower lens and limited control, making flattering skin tones and background blur harder to achieve, especially indoors. No RAW reduces post-practice flexibility.
Landscape
-
TG-6’s 12 MP sensor with decent dynamic range retains highlight and shadow detail better than the SL202. Weather sealing means you can shoot landscapes in rain or dust without fear.
-
SL202 is more limited, better suited to clear daylight. No weather resistance means caution outdoors.
Wildlife & Macro
-
TG-6’s rapid contrast-detect AF with tracking and 1 cm macro focus range puts it miles ahead for insect or flower close-ups and steady telephoto shots.
-
SL202’s slower AF and minimal macro range limit wildlife capture to casual distant subjects.
Sports
-
TG-6’s 20 fps burst and continuous AF help freeze action sequences in daylight.
-
SL202 does not list continuous shooting, limiting sports utility.
Street Photography
-
SL202’s small size gives an edge in discretion and portability for street shooters desiring a no-fuss, pocketable camera.
-
TG-6’s bulk may attract attention but is rugged and quick to operate.
Night and Astro
-
TG-6’s high ISO capabilities and sensor stabilization allow handheld night and star photography with better results.
-
SL202’s ISO ceiling, lack of stabilization, and slow shutter limit nighttime potential.
Video
| Feature | Olympus TG-6 | Samsung SL202 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Resolution | 4K UHD (3840x2160 @30p) | VGA (640x480 @30p) |
| Video Codec | H.264 MOV, 102 Mbps | Motion JPEG |
| Stabilization | Yes (sensor-shift IS) | No |
| Microphone Input | No | No |
TG-6’s high-quality 4K video with stabilization is a strong advantage for vlogging and travel recording, despite lacking external mic input. SL202’s video is severely limited in resolution and codec quality, restricting usability.
Battery Life and Storage
-
TG-6: Fairly strong with 340 shots per charge (CIPA standard). Uses rechargeable Lithium-ion pack (LI-92B).
-
SL202: No official CIPA data; uses an older battery (SLB-10A) with more modest capacity.
Both accept SD/SDHC/SDXC cards, but TG-6 supports faster UHS-I speeds advantageous for 4K video and rapid shooting.
Connectivity & Extras
| Feature | Olympus TG-6 | Samsung SL202 |
|---|---|---|
| Wireless Connectivity | Built-in Wi-Fi + GPS | None |
| Bluetooth / NFC | None | None |
| HDMI Output | Yes | No |
| USB | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0 |
| GPS | Built-in GPS Tagging | None |
The TG-6 provides essential wireless features for instant sharing and geotagging - a must for modern travel and social media enthusiasts. SL202 lacks all wireless/software enhancements.
Pricing and Value
-
Olympus TG-6: Around $449 USD, this camera commands a premium justified by waterproof ruggedness, versatile macro, 4K video, and advanced sensor technology.
-
Samsung SL202: At roughly $140 USD secondhand (no longer produced new), it’s an economical choice for casual users not needing advanced features or durability.
Sample Images Showcase
To get a sense of actual image quality and color, here are side-by-side sample galleries from both cameras across various conditions.
- Notice the TG-6’s superior detail retention, sharper edges, and brighter colors, especially in shadow areas.
- SL202 images generally show softer focus and less dynamic range.
Overall Performance Scores
Based on comprehensive testing metrics including sensor performance, autofocus, burst shooting, and video:
Genre-Specific Strengths Highlighted
A breakdown rating the cameras across popular photography types:
- TG-6 dominates in outdoor, macro, video, and adventurous photography.
- SL202 rates modestly in street and casual travel photography.
Final Thoughts and Recommendations
Who Should Choose the Olympus TG-6?
- Photographers seeking a rugged, all-weather camera that excels in macro, underwater, and action scenarios will appreciate the TG-6’s technology and durability.
- Videographers needing 4K video stabilization without a heavy rig.
- Enthusiasts wanting manual modes, RAW support, and wireless sharing options.
Who Should Consider the Samsung SL202?
- Casual shooters or beginners on a tight budget wanting a lightweight, easy-to-use camera.
- Users focused on daylight travel snapshots or street candid shooting who prioritize portability over advanced features.
- Those with minimal post-processing needs and no desire for video.
Wrapping Up
Selecting the best compact camera revolves around balancing your shooting style, environment, and expected output quality. The Olympus TG-6 emerges as a versatile, feature-rich powerhouse tailored to adventurous photographers craving reliability in hostile conditions plus creative flexibility.
Meanwhile, the Samsung SL202 retains value as a lightweight, budget-friendly point-and-shoot for casual casual shooters who prioritize simplicity.
We encourage you to handle both cameras in person if possible and consider the types of images you aspire to capture. Pair your camera with the right accessories - extra batteries, high-speed memory cards, or protective gear - to maximize your satisfaction.
No matter your choice, both the TG-6 and SL202 represent accessible entry points to the creative world of photography, each with a distinct character and audience. Happy shooting!
Explore, experiment, and let your vision guide every picture.
For further guidance and personalized advice, don't hesitate to check out hands-on field reviews and workshops specific to your photography interests. Finding the right camera is a journey - let’s take it together.
Olympus TG-6 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-6 | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-6 | Samsung SL202 |
| Also referred to as | - | PL50 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2019-05-22 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 1,040k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 20.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Red Eye Reduction, Slow sync. (1st curtain), Red-eye Slow sync. (1st curtain), Fill- in, Manual, Flash Off | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PC | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 253 gr (0.56 lbs) | 168 gr (0.37 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 pictures | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I support) | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $449 | $140 |