Olympus TG-6 vs Samsung WB150F
90 Imaging
38 Features
54 Overall
44
93 Imaging
37 Features
42 Overall
39
Olympus TG-6 vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 253g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Announced May 2019
- Earlier Model is Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2012
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-6 vs Samsung WB150F Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Olympus TG-6 vs Samsung WB150F, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the TG-6 (12MP) and the WB150F (14MP) is very similar and they come with the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TG-6 was manufactured 7 years after the WB150F which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a in depth comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the TG-6 grades against the WB150F for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-6 vs Samsung WB150F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-6 and Samsung WB150F. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-6 Gallery and Samsung WB150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-6 over the Samsung WB150F
| TG-6 | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | May 2019 | January 2012 | Newer by 90 months | |
| Display resolution | 1040k | 460k | Crisper display (+580k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Olympus TG-6
| WB150F | TG-6 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-6 and Samsung WB150F
| TG-6 | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-6 vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-6 has got physical dimensions of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 253 grams (0.56 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB150F has sizing of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-6 vs Samsung WB150F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the TG-6 versus the WB150F.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-6 and WB150F is 90 and 93 respectively.
Olympus TG-6 vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to picture the gap between sensor dimensions only by reading specs. The picture here will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-6 and WB150F.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You should expect to see the Samsung WB150F to deliver more detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images far more aggressively. The fresher TG-6 provides an edge in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-6 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus TG-6 vs Samsung WB150F Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-6 | Samsung WB150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-6 | Samsung WB150F |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2019-05-22 | 2012-01-09 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 1,040k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 20.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Red Eye Reduction, Slow sync. (1st curtain), Red-eye Slow sync. (1st curtain), Fill- in, Manual, Flash Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PC | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 253 gr (0.56 lb) | 188 gr (0.41 lb) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 images | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I support) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $449 | $230 |