Olympus TG-6 vs Samsung WB35F
90 Imaging
38 Features
54 Overall
44
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Olympus TG-6 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 253g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Revealed May 2019
- Previous Model is Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced January 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-6 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
The following is a comprehensive review of the Olympus TG-6 vs Samsung WB35F, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the TG-6 (12MP) and WB35F (16MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe TG-6 was revealed 5 years after the WB35F which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a full comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the TG-6 matches up vs the WB35F for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-6 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-6 and Samsung WB35F. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-6 Gallery and Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-6 over the Samsung WB35F
| TG-6 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2019 | January 2014 | Newer by 66 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Sharper screen (+810k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Olympus TG-6
| WB35F | TG-6 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-6 and Samsung WB35F
| TG-6 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither features Touch screen |
Olympus TG-6 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-6 enjoys outer dimensions of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 253 grams (0.56 lbs) while the Samsung WB35F has proportions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-6 vs Samsung WB35F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is a front view size comparison of the TG-6 vs the WB35F.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-6 and WB35F is 90 and 93 respectively.
Olympus TG-6 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions just by going through technical specs. The pic here should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-6 and WB35F.
As you can tell, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You should count on the Samsung WB35F to produce more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The younger TG-6 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-6 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus TG-6 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-6 | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-6 | Samsung WB35F |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2019-05-22 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VIII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 20.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, Red Eye Reduction, Slow sync. (1st curtain), Red-eye Slow sync. (1st curtain), Fill- in, Manual, Flash Off | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PC | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 253 grams (0.56 pounds) | 194 grams (0.43 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 shots | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-92B | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I support) | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $449 | $130 |