Olympus TG-6 vs Sigma fp
90 Imaging
39 Features
54 Overall
45
84 Imaging
75 Features
79 Overall
76
Olympus TG-6 vs Sigma fp Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 253g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Launched May 2019
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Raise to 102400)
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Leica L Mount
- 422g - 113 x 70 x 45mm
- Released July 2019
- Newer Model is Sigma fp L
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-6 vs Sigma fp Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Olympus TG-6 vs Sigma fp, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Sigma. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the TG-6 (12MP) and fp (25MP) and the TG-6 (1/2.3") and fp (Full frame) boast totally different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-6 was launched within a month of the fp which means that they are of a similar age. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-6 being a Compact camera and the Sigma fp being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the TG-6 matches up vs the fp in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-6 vs Sigma fp Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-6 & Sigma fp. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-6 Gallery & Sigma fp Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-6 over the Sigma fp
| TG-6 | fp |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma fp over the Olympus TG-6
| fp | TG-6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3.2" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
| Screen resolution | 2100k |  | 1040k | Crisper screen (+1060k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-6 and Sigma fp
| TG-6 | fp | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2019 |  | July 2019 | Same age |
| Focus manually |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus TG-6 vs Sigma fp Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus TG-6 enjoys exterior dimensions of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 253 grams (0.56 lbs) while the Sigma fp has specifications of 113mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") with a weight of 422 grams (0.93 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-6 vs Sigma fp in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have during that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the TG-6 vs the fp.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-6 and fp is 90 and 84 respectively.
Olympus TG-6 vs Sigma fp Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to envision the gap in sensor sizes purely by going through specifications. The image here should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-6 and fp.
Plainly, each of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The TG-6 featuring a smaller sensor will make shooting shallow DOF more challenging and the Sigma fp will provide more detail utilizing its extra 13 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots a good deal more aggressively.
Olympus TG-6 vs Sigma fp Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus TG-6 vs Sigma fp Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-6 | Sigma fp | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-6 | Sigma fp |
| Class | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2019-05-22 | 2019-07-11 |
| Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.9 x 23.9mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 858.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 25MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 102400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Min enhanced ISO | - | 6 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | 49 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Leica L |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 30 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3.2 inch |
| Resolution of display | 1,040k dots | 2,100k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 20.0 frames per second | 12.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, Red Eye Reduction, Slow sync. (1st curtain), Red-eye Slow sync. (1st curtain), Fill- in, Manual, Flash Off | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PC | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | No |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 253 gr (0.56 lb) | 422 gr (0.93 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 113 x 70 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 pictures | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-92B | BP-51 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 wec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I support) | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $449 | $2,050 |