Olympus TG-6 vs Sony A390
90 Imaging
39 Features
54 Overall
45
66 Imaging
54 Features
54 Overall
54
Olympus TG-6 vs Sony A390 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 253g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Revealed May 2019
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Introduced July 2010
- Old Model is Sony A380
Olympus TG-6 vs Sony A390 Overview
In this write-up, we are matching up the Olympus TG-6 and Sony A390, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the TG-6 (12MP) and the A390 (14MP) is fairly similar but the TG-6 (1/2.3") and A390 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TG-6 was announced 8 years after the A390 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-6 being a Compact camera and the Sony A390 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a short view of how the TG-6 grades versus the A390 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus TG-6 vs Sony A390 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-6 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A390. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-6 Gallery & Sony A390 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-6 over the Sony A390
TG-6 | A390 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | May 2019 | July 2010 | More modern by 108 months | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Clearer display (+810k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Olympus TG-6
A390 | TG-6 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Olympus TG-6 and Sony A390
TG-6 | A390 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More accurate focus | |||
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither provides Touch display |
Olympus TG-6 vs Sony A390 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-6 provides external dimensions of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 253 grams (0.56 lbs) whilst the Sony A390 has sizing of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") along with a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-6 and Sony A390 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the TG-6 versus the A390.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-6 and A390 is 90 and 66 respectively.
Olympus TG-6 vs Sony A390 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to see the difference between sensor sizes just by reviewing specifications. The image underneath might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-6 and A390.
Plainly, both of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The TG-6 using its tinier sensor will make shooting bokeh more challenging and the Sony A390 will deliver greater detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics far more aggressively. The fresher TG-6 is going to have a benefit in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-6 vs Sony A390 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-6 vs Sony A390 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-6 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Tough TG-6 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
Revealed | 2019-05-22 | 2010-07-28 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4592 x 3056 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 25 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 1,040k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 20.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, Red Eye Reduction, Slow sync. (1st curtain), Red-eye Slow sync. (1st curtain), Fill- in, Manual, Flash Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PC | - |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | None |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 253g (0.56 lb) | 549g (1.21 lb) |
Dimensions | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 66 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 607 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 shots | 230 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-92B | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I support) | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $449 | $500 |