Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
86 Imaging
53 Features
66 Overall
58
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Revealed February 2018
- Also Known as Lumix DC-TZ200
- Replaced the Panasonic ZS100
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic ZS200, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and ZS200 (20MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and ZS200 (1") offer different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe XZ-2 iHS was released 6 years before the ZS200 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving into a full comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the XZ-2 iHS scores vs the ZS200 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Panasonic ZS200
XZ-2 iHS | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
ZS200 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2018 | December 2012 | More recent by 62 months | |
Display resolution | 1240k | 920k | Clearer display (+320k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic ZS200
XZ-2 iHS | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has outer measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS200 has specifications of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") having a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic ZS200 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the ZS200.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and ZS200 is 85 and 86 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to imagine the difference between sensor measurements merely by reading through a spec sheet. The visual underneath will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and ZS200.
As you can see, the 2 cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The XZ-2 iHS featuring a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Panasonic ZS200 will give greater detail as a result of its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics more aggressively. The older XZ-2 iHS is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
Also called | - | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2012-12-18 | 2018-02-13 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | MOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 920k dot | 1,240k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346 grams (0.76 lb) | 340 grams (0.75 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 images | 370 images |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $450 | $800 |