Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/408a9/408a9d2866582d16da93a6b808591f0e980025dc" alt="Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 front Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 front"
86 Imaging
53 Features
66 Overall
58
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Revealed February 2018
- Also Known as Lumix DC-TZ200
- Replaced the Panasonic ZS100
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic ZS200, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and ZS200 (20MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and ZS200 (1") offer different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The XZ-2 iHS was released 6 years before the ZS200 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving into a full comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the XZ-2 iHS scores vs the ZS200 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Panasonic ZS200
XZ-2 iHS | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
ZS200 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2018 | ![]() | December 2012 | More recent by 62 months |
Display resolution | 1240k | ![]() | 920k | Clearer display (+320k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic ZS200
XZ-2 iHS | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has outer measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS200 has specifications of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") having a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic ZS200 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the ZS200.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a5844/a5844421460f072e34775fc3872d8b72c413f23b" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and ZS200 is 85 and 86 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4dc6/a4dc66a4e038b6d8f97d4909395b3581f35001dc" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to imagine the difference between sensor measurements merely by reading through a spec sheet. The visual underneath will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and ZS200.
As you can see, the 2 cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The XZ-2 iHS featuring a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Panasonic ZS200 will give greater detail as a result of its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics more aggressively. The older XZ-2 iHS is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f64b/8f64b936ffbe56f9c83840155d7766cf846461f3" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05d85/05d85a345ea86bc299650fd86faff36a21b9bc9a" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
Also called | - | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2012-12-18 | 2018-02-13 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | MOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 920k dot | 1,240k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346 grams (0.76 lb) | 340 grams (0.75 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 images | 370 images |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $450 | $800 |