Olympus TG-6 vs Sony QX1
90 Imaging
39 Features
54 Overall
45
90 Imaging
63 Features
48 Overall
57
Olympus TG-6 vs Sony QX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 253g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Announced May 2019
- Replaced the Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 216g - 74 x 70 x 53mm
- Revealed September 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus TG-6 vs Sony QX1 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Olympus TG-6 and Sony QX1, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Lens-style by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the TG-6 (12MP) and QX1 (20MP) and the TG-6 (1/2.3") and QX1 (APS-C) boast different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TG-6 was unveiled 4 years later than the QX1 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-6 being a Compact camera and the Sony QX1 being a Lens-style camera.
Before going right into a detailed comparison, here is a short highlight of how the TG-6 grades vs the QX1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-6 vs Sony QX1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-6 & Sony Alpha QX1. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-6 Gallery & Sony QX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-6 over the Sony QX1
| TG-6 | QX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | May 2019 |  | September 2014 | More recent by 58 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | " | Larger display (+3") |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 0k | Sharper display (+1040k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX1 over the Olympus TG-6
| QX1 | TG-6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-6 and Sony QX1
| TG-6 | QX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus TG-6 vs Sony QX1 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-6 offers outside dimensions of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 253 grams (0.56 lbs) and the Sony QX1 has dimensions of 74mm x 70mm x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-6 and Sony QX1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the TG-6 and the QX1.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-6 and QX1 is 90 and 90 respectively.
Olympus TG-6 vs Sony QX1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to imagine the gap in sensor measurements just by researching a spec sheet. The graphic below will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-6 and QX1.
As you can see, the 2 cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The TG-6 using its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field tougher and the Sony QX1 will render more detail having an extra 8MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images way more aggressively. The more modern TG-6 provides an advantage in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-6 vs Sony QX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus TG-6 vs Sony QX1 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-6 | Sony Alpha QX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-6 | Sony Alpha QX1 |
| Type | Waterproof | Lens-style |
| Announced | 2019-05-22 | 2014-09-03 |
| Physical type | Compact | Lens-style |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VIII | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.2 x 15.4mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 357.3mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5456 x 3632 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 16000 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.6 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | - |
| Resolution of display | 1,040k dots | 0k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 20.0 frames per sec | 4.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Red Eye Reduction, Slow sync. (1st curtain), Red-eye Slow sync. (1st curtain), Fill- in, Manual, Flash Off | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, rear sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PC | 1920 x 1080 (30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 253g (0.56 lbs) | 216g (0.48 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 74 x 70 x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 pictures | 440 pictures |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I support) | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $449 | $500 |