Olympus TG-6 vs Sony HX200V
Portability
90 Imaging
39 Features
54 Overall
45
90 Imaging
39 Features
54 Overall
45
Portability
66 Imaging
42 Features
55 Overall
47
66 Imaging
42 Features
55 Overall
47
Olympus TG-6 vs Sony HX200V Key Specs
Olympus TG-6
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 253g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Introduced May 2019
- Older Model is Olympus TG-5
Sony HX200V
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 27-810mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 583g - 122 x 87 x 93mm
- Revealed May 2012
- Old Model is Sony HX100V
- Newer Model is Sony HX300
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-6 vs Sony HX200V Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the Olympus TG-6 vs Sony HX200V, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the TG-6 (12MP) and HX200V (18MP) but they come with the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-6 was launched 7 years after the HX200V which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-6 being a Compact camera and the Sony HX200V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a short summary of how the TG-6 scores versus the HX200V with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-6 vs Sony HX200V Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-6 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V. The complete galleries are available at Olympus TG-6 Gallery and Sony HX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-6 over the Sony HX200V
| TG-6 | HX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | May 2019 |  | May 2012 | More modern by 86 months |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 922k | Clearer display (+118k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony HX200V over the Olympus TG-6
| HX200V | TG-6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Olympus TG-6 and Sony HX200V
| TG-6 | HX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither has Touch display |
Olympus TG-6 vs Sony HX200V Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus TG-6 has exterior dimensions of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 253 grams (0.56 lbs) and the Sony HX200V has specifications of 122mm x 87mm x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 583 grams (1.29 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-6 vs Sony HX200V in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose at that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the TG-6 against the HX200V.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the TG-6 and HX200V is 90 and 66 respectively.
Olympus TG-6 vs Sony HX200V Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to picture the gap in sensor sizes only by viewing technical specs. The picture underneath might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-6 and HX200V.
As you can tell, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You should expect to see the Sony HX200V to result in more detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images a little more aggressively. The more modern TG-6 should have an advantage in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-6 vs Sony HX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-6 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony HX200V as a Portrait photography camera
focusing manually
provides face detect focus
saves RAW formats
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
you can focus manually
decent sensor resolution (18MP)
has face detection autofocus
external flash not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Olympus TG-6 Street photography details
Sony HX200V Street photography details
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
environment proof
fixed screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
more heavy than average in class (253 grams)
screen tilts
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
heavier than others in class (583 grams)
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsSports Comparison
Olympus TG-6 as a Sports photography camera
Sony HX200V as a Sports photography camera
max fps high (20.0 frames/s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides tracking focus
environment proof
better than average battery (340 per charge)
no shutter priority mode
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
long zoom range (27-810mm 30.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (18MP)
has tracking autofocus
good battery (450 CIPA)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Olympus TG-6 as a Travel photography camera
Sony HX200V as a Travel photography camera
better than average battery (340 shots)
environment proof
has built in flash
relatively wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
more heavy than average in class (253g)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
good battery (450 CIPA)
decent sensor resolution (18MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (27mm)
long reach (810mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
heavier than others in class (583 grams)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Olympus TG-6 Landscape photography advice
Sony HX200V Landscape photography advice
focusing manually
relatively wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
nice screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
environment proof
better than average battery (340 per charge)
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
manual exposure not possible
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
you can focus manually
pretty wide (27mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (18 megapixels)
good battery (450 CIPA)
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
does not have Time Lapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-6 Vlogging information
Sony HX200V Vlogging information
relatively wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect focus
good video quality (3840 x 2160 pixels)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
lack of microphone socket
more heavy than average in class (253g)
pretty wide (27mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have external mic support
heavier than others in class (583g)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Olympus TG-6 vs Sony HX200V Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-6 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-6 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2019-05-22 | 2012-05-11 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VIII | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 27-810mm (30.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 1,040k dots | 922k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | - | XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 20.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 12.40 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Red Eye Reduction, Slow sync. (1st curtain), Red-eye Slow sync. (1st curtain), Fill- in, Manual, Flash Off | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PC | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 253 grams (0.56 lbs) | 583 grams (1.29 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 122 x 87 x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 photographs | 450 photographs |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | NP-FH50 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I support) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $449 | $480 |
