Olympus TG-6 vs Sony QX10
90 Imaging
38 Features
54 Overall
44
96 Imaging
42 Features
34 Overall
38
Olympus TG-6 vs Sony QX10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 253g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Launched May 2019
- Superseded the Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1440 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 105g - 62 x 62 x 33mm
- Released September 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-6 vs Sony QX10 Overview
The following is a extended analysis of the Olympus TG-6 versus Sony QX10, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Lens-style by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the TG-6 (12MP) and QX10 (18MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe TG-6 was released 5 years after the QX10 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-6 being a Compact camera and the Sony QX10 being a Lens-style camera.
Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the TG-6 grades against the QX10 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-6 vs Sony QX10 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-6 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-6 Gallery & Sony QX10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-6 over the Sony QX10
| TG-6 | QX10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2019 |  | September 2013 | Newer by 70 months |
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | " | Bigger screen (+3") |
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 0k | Clearer screen (+1040k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX10 over the Olympus TG-6
| QX10 | TG-6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-6 and Sony QX10
| TG-6 | QX10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus TG-6 vs Sony QX10 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera often, you'll need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-6 features physical measurements of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 253 grams (0.56 lbs) whilst the Sony QX10 has sizing of 62mm x 62mm x 33mm (2.4" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-6 versus Sony QX10 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose during that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the TG-6 vs the QX10.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the TG-6 and QX10 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Olympus TG-6 vs Sony QX10 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to see the difference in sensor dimensions only by seeing a spec sheet. The picture underneath might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-6 and QX10.
Clearly, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Sony QX10 to provide greater detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The fresher TG-6 will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-6 vs Sony QX10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus TG-6 vs Sony QX10 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-6 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-6 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10 |
| Category | Waterproof | Lens-style |
| Launched | 2019-05-22 | 2013-09-04 |
| Physical type | Compact | Lens-style |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 18MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | - |
| Resolution of display | 1,040k dots | 0k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | - | Depends on connected smartphone |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 20.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, Red Eye Reduction, Slow sync. (1st curtain), Red-eye Slow sync. (1st curtain), Fill- in, Manual, Flash Off | None |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PC | 1440 x 1080 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1440x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 253 gr (0.56 lb) | 105 gr (0.23 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 62 x 62 x 33mm (2.4" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 pictures | 220 pictures |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | NP-BN, |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I support) | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $449 | $250 |