Olympus TG-6 vs Sony QX10
90 Imaging
39 Features
54 Overall
45
96 Imaging
43 Features
34 Overall
39
Olympus TG-6 vs Sony QX10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 253g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Launched May 2019
- Superseded the Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1440 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 105g - 62 x 62 x 33mm
- Released September 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-6 vs Sony QX10 Overview
The following is a extended analysis of the Olympus TG-6 versus Sony QX10, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Lens-style by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the TG-6 (12MP) and QX10 (18MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe TG-6 was released 5 years after the QX10 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-6 being a Compact camera and the Sony QX10 being a Lens-style camera.
Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the TG-6 grades against the QX10 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-6 vs Sony QX10 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-6 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-6 Gallery & Sony QX10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-6 over the Sony QX10
| TG-6 | QX10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2019 |  | September 2013 | Newer by 70 months |
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | " | Bigger screen (+3") |
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 0k | Clearer screen (+1040k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX10 over the Olympus TG-6
| QX10 | TG-6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-6 and Sony QX10
| TG-6 | QX10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus TG-6 vs Sony QX10 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera often, you'll need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-6 features physical measurements of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 253 grams (0.56 lbs) whilst the Sony QX10 has sizing of 62mm x 62mm x 33mm (2.4" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-6 versus Sony QX10 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose during that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the TG-6 vs the QX10.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the TG-6 and QX10 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Olympus TG-6 vs Sony QX10 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to see the difference in sensor dimensions only by seeing a spec sheet. The picture underneath might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-6 and QX10.
Clearly, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Sony QX10 to provide greater detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The fresher TG-6 will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-6 vs Sony QX10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus TG-6 vs Sony QX10 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-6 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-6 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10 |
| Category | Waterproof | Lens-style |
| Launched | 2019-05-22 | 2013-09-04 |
| Physical type | Compact | Lens-style |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 18MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | - |
| Resolution of display | 1,040k dots | 0k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | - | Depends on connected smartphone |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 20.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, Red Eye Reduction, Slow sync. (1st curtain), Red-eye Slow sync. (1st curtain), Fill- in, Manual, Flash Off | None |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PC | 1440 x 1080 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1440x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 253 gr (0.56 lb) | 105 gr (0.23 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 62 x 62 x 33mm (2.4" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 pictures | 220 pictures |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | NP-BN, |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I support) | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $449 | $250 |
