Olympus VG-110 vs Olympus VR-320
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Olympus VG-110 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Revealed February 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
- Newer Model is Olympus VR-330
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus VG-110 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Below is a extended assessment of the Olympus VG-110 versus Olympus VR-320, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are created by Olympus. The resolution of the VG-110 (12MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is fairly similar and both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe VG-110 was announced 5 months prior to the VR-320 so they are both of a similar age. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the VG-110 grades versus the VR-320 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus VG-110 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VG-110 & Olympus VR-320. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus VG-110 Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Olympus VR-320
| VG-110 | VR-320 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Olympus VG-110
| VR-320 | VG-110 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus VG-110 and Olympus VR-320
| VG-110 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2011 | July 2011 | Similar age | |
| Manual focus | No manual focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Same display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Olympus VG-110 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus VG-110 has external measurements of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") having a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs) while the Olympus VR-320 has measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus VG-110 versus Olympus VR-320 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the VG-110 vs the VR-320.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VG-110 and VR-320 is 97 and 94 respectively.
Olympus VG-110 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to envision the difference between sensor measurements simply by reading technical specs. The photograph underneath will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the VG-110 and VR-320.
As you can tell, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Olympus VR-320 to offer extra detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a good deal more aggressively.
Olympus VG-110 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus VG-110 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Olympus VG-110 | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus VG-110 | Olympus VR-320 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2011-02-08 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 105g (0.23 lbs) | 158g (0.35 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 170 images | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-70B | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $150 | $179 |