Olympus VG-110 vs Olympus VR-320
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
![Olympus VG-110 front Olympus VG-110 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-VG-110/Olympus-VG-110-front.jpg)
![Olympus VR-320 front Olympus VR-320 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-VR-320/Olympus-VR-320-front.jpg)
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Olympus VG-110 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Revealed February 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
- Newer Model is Olympus VR-330
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Olympus VG-110 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Below is a extended assessment of the Olympus VG-110 versus Olympus VR-320, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are created by Olympus. The resolution of the VG-110 (12MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is fairly similar and both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
The VG-110 was announced 5 months prior to the VR-320 so they are both of a similar age. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the VG-110 grades versus the VR-320 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Olympus VG-110 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VG-110 & Olympus VR-320. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus VG-110 Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Olympus VR-320
VG-110 | VR-320 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Olympus VG-110
VR-320 | VG-110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus VG-110 and Olympus VR-320
VG-110 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2011 | ![]() | July 2011 | Similar age |
Manual focus | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Missing Touch display |
Olympus VG-110 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus VG-110 has external measurements of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") having a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs) while the Olympus VR-320 has measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus VG-110 versus Olympus VR-320 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the VG-110 vs the VR-320.
![Olympus VG-110 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison Olympus VG-110 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-VG-110-vs-Olympus-VR-320-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VG-110 and VR-320 is 97 and 94 respectively.
![Olympus VG-110 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison Olympus VG-110 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-VG-110-vs-Olympus-VR-320-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Olympus VG-110 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to envision the difference between sensor measurements simply by reading technical specs. The photograph underneath will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the VG-110 and VR-320.
As you can tell, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Olympus VR-320 to offer extra detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a good deal more aggressively.
![Olympus VG-110 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison Olympus VG-110 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Olympus-VG-110-vs-Olympus-VR-320-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Olympus VG-110 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
![Olympus VG-110 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VG-110 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-VG-110-vs-Olympus-VR-320-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Olympus VG-110 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
Olympus VG-110 | Olympus VR-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus VG-110 | Olympus VR-320 |
Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2011-02-08 | 2011-07-19 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 4.70 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 105g (0.23 lbs) | 158g (0.35 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 170 images | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-70B | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $150 | $179 |