Olympus VG-110 vs Olympus VR-330
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
Olympus VG-110 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Introduced February 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced February 2011
- Earlier Model is Olympus VR-320
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus VG-110 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
Below is a comprehensive comparison of the Olympus VG-110 versus Olympus VR-330, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both sold by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the VG-110 (12MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is fairly comparable and they possess the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe VG-110 was unveiled within a month of the VR-330 so they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera.
Before going through a detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the VG-110 grades versus the VR-330 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus VG-110 vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VG-110 and Olympus VR-330. The full galleries are provided at Olympus VG-110 Gallery and Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Olympus VR-330
| VG-110 | VR-330 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Olympus VG-110
| VR-330 | VG-110 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-110 and Olympus VR-330
| VG-110 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2011 |  | February 2011 | Same generation |
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither offers Touch display |
Olympus VG-110 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus VG-110 offers outer dimensions of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") with a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs) and the Olympus VR-330 has sizing of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Look at the Olympus VG-110 versus Olympus VR-330 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the VG-110 versus the VR-330.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the VG-110 and VR-330 is 97 and 94 respectively.
Olympus VG-110 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to imagine the difference in sensor measurements simply by checking out specifications. The graphic underneath might give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the VG-110 and VR-330.
To sum up, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You should anticipate the Olympus VR-330 to produce greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos a little more aggressively.
Olympus VG-110 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus VG-110 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
| Olympus VG-110 | Olympus VR-330 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus VG-110 | Olympus VR-330 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2011-02-08 | 2011-02-08 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 105 grams (0.23 pounds) | 158 grams (0.35 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 170 photos | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-70B | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $150 | $220 |