Olympus VG-110 vs Panasonic FS42
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/28610/28610d92a1bc9db50c39d8fc3686aeec0604eb40" alt="Olympus VG-110 front Olympus VG-110 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9979/f9979d6158b07faa33963a04f4938253f5f9ce99" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front"
95 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
Olympus VG-110 vs Panasonic FS42 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Launched February 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000 (Boost to 6400)
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
- Announced April 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus VG-110 vs Panasonic FS42 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus VG-110 vs Panasonic FS42, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the VG-110 (12MP) and the FS42 (10MP) is fairly well matched but the VG-110 (1/2.3") and FS42 (1/2.5") posses totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The VG-110 was brought out 23 months later than the FS42 making them a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before diving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief overview of how the VG-110 grades against the FS42 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus VG-110 vs Panasonic FS42 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VG-110 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42. The entire galleries are available at Olympus VG-110 Gallery and Panasonic FS42 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Panasonic FS42
VG-110 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2011 | ![]() | April 2009 | More recent by 23 months |
Display size | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Olympus VG-110
FS42 | VG-110 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus VG-110 and Panasonic FS42
VG-110 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Olympus VG-110 vs Panasonic FS42 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus VG-110 enjoys outer measurements of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") with a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs) and the Panasonic FS42 has specifications of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).
Examine the Olympus VG-110 vs Panasonic FS42 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select at the time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the VG-110 against the FS42.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/373a4/373a4263656c59f419cc45d3d2e582d7f23d7178" alt="Olympus VG-110 vs Panasonic FS42 size comparison Olympus VG-110 vs Panasonic FS42 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the VG-110 and FS42 is 97 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24b9b/24b9bade38f28631910e8c65b86a26ae8c499c68" alt="Olympus VG-110 vs Panasonic FS42 top view buttons comparison Olympus VG-110 vs Panasonic FS42 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VG-110 vs Panasonic FS42 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to envision the gap between sensor measurements simply by reading through a spec sheet. The visual here will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the VG-110 and FS42.
Clearly, both of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The VG-110 because of its larger sensor will make shooting bokeh easier and the Olympus VG-110 will give more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics way more aggressively. The younger VG-110 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c611d/c611d8970e8a4ae16a4e8ee6623332ed099e2d64" alt="Olympus VG-110 vs Panasonic FS42 sensor size comparison Olympus VG-110 vs Panasonic FS42 sensor size comparison"
Olympus VG-110 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57688/576885365f3a7ee04c225250a523ed81d453e9f9" alt="Olympus VG-110 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VG-110 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus VG-110 vs Panasonic FS42 Specifications
Olympus VG-110 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus VG-110 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 |
Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2011-02-08 | 2009-04-17 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1000 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 2.5 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 6.30 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 105 gr (0.23 pounds) | 132 gr (0.29 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 170 photos | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-70B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $150 | $580 |