Olympus VG-110 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Olympus VG-110 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Launched February 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 198g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Announced February 2012
Olympus VG-110 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the Olympus VG-110 versus Pentax WG-2 GPS, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Pentax. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the VG-110 (12MP) and WG-2 GPS (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe VG-110 was brought out 12 months before the WG-2 GPS so they are of a similar generation. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera and the Pentax WG-2 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a quick view of how the VG-110 matches up vs the WG-2 GPS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus VG-110 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VG-110 and Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus VG-110 Gallery and Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Pentax WG-2 GPS
VG-110 | WG-2 GPS |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 GPS over the Olympus VG-110
WG-2 GPS | VG-110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2012 | February 2011 | Newer by 12 months | |
Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-110 and Pentax WG-2 GPS
VG-110 | WG-2 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Absent Touch display |
Olympus VG-110 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VG-110 offers external measurements of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") having a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs) whilst the Pentax WG-2 GPS has dimensions of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 198 grams (0.44 lbs).
Check the Olympus VG-110 versus Pentax WG-2 GPS in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising at the time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the VG-110 and the WG-2 GPS.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VG-110 and WG-2 GPS is 97 and 91 respectively.
Olympus VG-110 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Sensor Comparison
Typically, its hard to see the contrast in sensor dimensions just by looking through technical specs. The picture underneath should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the VG-110 and WG-2 GPS.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Pentax WG-2 GPS to provide you with greater detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged VG-110 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus VG-110 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VG-110 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Specifications
Olympus VG-110 | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus VG-110 | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS |
Class | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
Launched | 2011-02-08 | 2012-02-07 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | TFT Color LCD | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 5.40 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 105 grams (0.23 lbs) | 198 grams (0.44 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 170 pictures | 260 pictures |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-70B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $150 | $300 |