Olympus VG-110 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Olympus VG-110 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Introduced February 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced July 2013
Olympus VG-110 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Olympus VG-110 versus Pentax WG-3 GPS, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the VG-110 (12MP) and WG-3 GPS (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe VG-110 was brought out 3 years prior to the WG-3 GPS and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera and the Pentax WG-3 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a detailed comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the VG-110 matches up versus the WG-3 GPS in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus VG-110 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VG-110 & Pentax WG-3 GPS. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus VG-110 Gallery & Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
VG-110 | WG-3 GPS |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Olympus VG-110
WG-3 GPS | VG-110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2013 | February 2011 | Fresher by 29 months | |
Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-110 and Pentax WG-3 GPS
VG-110 | WG-3 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Absent Touch display |
Olympus VG-110 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VG-110 has outside measurements of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") and a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs) while the Pentax WG-3 GPS has dimensions of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs).
Check out the Olympus VG-110 versus Pentax WG-3 GPS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose at the time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the VG-110 vs the WG-3 GPS.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VG-110 and WG-3 GPS is 97 and 90 respectively.
Olympus VG-110 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to envision the difference in sensor sizing merely by viewing specifications. The photograph here may provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the VG-110 and WG-3 GPS.
To sum up, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Pentax WG-3 GPS to render greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos more aggressively. The older VG-110 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus VG-110 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VG-110 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Specifications
Olympus VG-110 | Pentax WG-3 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus VG-110 | Pentax WG-3 GPS |
Class | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2011-02-08 | 2013-07-19 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 105g (0.23 lb) | 238g (0.52 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 170 photos | 240 photos |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-70B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $150 | $350 |