Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh CX2
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Introduced February 2011
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched August 2009
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
Here is a comprehensive comparison of the Olympus VG-110 and Ricoh CX2, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the VG-110 (12MP) and CX2 (9MP) but they possess the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe VG-110 was brought out 18 months later than the CX2 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick view of how the VG-110 scores vs the CX2 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VG-110 & Ricoh CX2. The entire galleries are available at Olympus VG-110 Gallery & Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Ricoh CX2
VG-110 | CX2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2011 | August 2009 | Fresher by 18 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Olympus VG-110
CX2 | VG-110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-110 and Ricoh CX2
VG-110 | CX2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither contains Touch display |
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus VG-110 has got physical measurements of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") with a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX2 has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
Compare the Olympus VG-110 and Ricoh CX2 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the VG-110 against the CX2.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the VG-110 and CX2 is 97 and 93 respectively.
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizing purely by checking specifications. The photograph below will help offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the VG-110 and CX2.
To sum up, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You can anticipate the Olympus VG-110 to give extra detail having its extra 3MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a little more aggressively. The younger VG-110 provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
Olympus VG-110 | Ricoh CX2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus VG-110 | Ricoh CX2 |
Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2011-02-08 | 2009-08-20 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 9MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3456 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 105 gr (0.23 lb) | 185 gr (0.41 lb) |
Dimensions | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 170 images | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-70B | DB-70 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $150 | $341 |