Clicky

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh CX2

Portability
97
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29
Olympus VG-110 front
 
Ricoh CX2 front
Portability
93
Imaging
32
Features
35
Overall
33

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs

Olympus VG-110
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
  • Introduced February 2011
Ricoh CX2
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
  • Launched August 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview

Here is a comprehensive comparison of the Olympus VG-110 and Ricoh CX2, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the VG-110 (12MP) and CX2 (9MP) but they possess the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The VG-110 was brought out 18 months later than the CX2 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera.

Before delving in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick view of how the VG-110 scores vs the CX2 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Ricoh CX2

 VG-110 CX2 
LaunchedFebruary 2011August 2009Fresher by 18 months

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Olympus VG-110

 CX2 VG-110 
Manual focus Dial accurate focusing
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution920k230kClearer display (+690k dot)

Common features in the Olympus VG-110 and Ricoh CX2

 VG-110 CX2 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch display Neither contains Touch display

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison

If you're planning to carry your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus VG-110 has got physical measurements of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") with a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX2 has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).

Compare the Olympus VG-110 and Ricoh CX2 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the VG-110 against the CX2.

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh CX2 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the VG-110 and CX2 is 97 and 93 respectively.

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh CX2 top view buttons comparison

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it's tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizing purely by checking specifications. The photograph below will help offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the VG-110 and CX2.

To sum up, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You can anticipate the Olympus VG-110 to give extra detail having its extra 3MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a little more aggressively. The younger VG-110 provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh CX2 sensor size comparison

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus VG-110
Portrait photography with Ricoh CX2
26
supports face detection focus
manual focus not available
manual mode not available
cannot use external flash
low MP (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
25
you can focus manually
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
low megapixels (9 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus VG-110 as a Street photography camera
Ricoh CX2 as a Street photography camera
48
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
61
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others (185 grams)
screen does not articulate
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus VG-110
Sports photography with Ricoh CX2
24
supports tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
low MP (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery pack (170 shots)
no phase detect auto focus
26
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of shutter priority mode
low megapixels (9MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus VG-110
Travel photography with Ricoh CX2
57
built-in flash
really wide (27mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
bad battery pack (170 CIPA)
low MP (12MP)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
66
lighter than others (185g)
flash built-in
decently wide (28mm)
great zoom (300mm)
low megapixels (9MP)
does not have selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VG-110 Landscape photography details
Ricoh CX2 Landscape photography details
27
really wide (27mm)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
manual mode not available
lack of image stabilization
low MP (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
bad battery pack (170 shots)
doesn't have Timelapse function
42
you can focus manually
decently wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
lack of manual exposure
low megapixels (9 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VG-110 Vlogging features
Ricoh CX2 Vlogging features
28
really wide (27mm)
supports face detection focus
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have external microphone socket
30
decently wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others (185g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
does not have selfie friendly display
video res low (640 x 480 pxls)
does not have mic port
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VG-110 and Ricoh CX2
 Olympus VG-110Ricoh CX2
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus VG-110 Ricoh CX2
Category Ultracompact Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2011-02-08 2009-08-20
Body design Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 9MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest Possible resolution 3968 x 2976 3456 x 2592
Maximum native ISO 1600 1600
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 27-108mm (4.0x) 28-300mm (10.7x)
Maximal aperture f/2.9-6.5 f/3.5-5.6
Macro focus distance 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 230 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display technology TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 seconds 8 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 4.70 m 3.00 m (ISO 400)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video file format MPEG-4 Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 105 gr (0.23 lb) 185 gr (0.41 lb)
Dimensions 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 170 images -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery model LI-70B DB-70
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at release $150 $341