Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh CX3
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh CX3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Launched February 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced June 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh CX3 Overview
Here, we are matching up the Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh CX3, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the VG-110 (12MP) and the CX3 (10MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras posses the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe VG-110 was introduced 8 months after the CX3 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh CX3 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick overview of how the VG-110 grades against the CX3 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh CX3 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VG-110 and Ricoh CX3. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus VG-110 Gallery and Ricoh CX3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Ricoh CX3
| VG-110 | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2011 |  | June 2010 | More modern by 8 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Olympus VG-110
| CX3 | VG-110 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-110 and Ricoh CX3
| VG-110 | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh CX3 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus VG-110 has got outer measurements of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") having a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs) while the Ricoh CX3 has proportions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check the Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh CX3 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the VG-110 versus the CX3.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the VG-110 and CX3 is 97 and 92 respectively.
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh CX3 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizes only by reading through a spec sheet. The picture below may give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the VG-110 and CX3.
Clearly, both cameras feature the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Olympus VG-110 to give you greater detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics way more aggressively. The more recent VG-110 should have an advantage in sensor technology.
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh CX3 Specifications
| Olympus VG-110 | Ricoh CX3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus VG-110 | Ricoh CX3 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2011-02-08 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 105 grams (0.23 lbs) | 206 grams (0.45 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 170 images | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-70B | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $150 | $329 |