Clicky

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GR

Portability
97
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29
Olympus VG-110 front
 
Ricoh GR front
Portability
90
Imaging
57
Features
54
Overall
55

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GR Key Specs

Olympus VG-110
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
  • Released February 2011
Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8) lens
  • 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
  • Revealed April 2013
  • Updated by Ricoh GR II
Photography Glossary

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GR Overview

Following is a extensive comparison of the Olympus VG-110 and Ricoh GR, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the VG-110 (12MP) and GR (16MP) and the VG-110 (1/2.3") and GR (APS-C) provide different sensor dimensions.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The VG-110 was announced 3 years before the GR which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before going straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a short summary of how the VG-110 matches up versus the GR in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Ricoh GR

 VG-110 GR 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Olympus VG-110

 GR VG-110 
RevealedApril 2013February 2011More modern by 26 months
Manually focus More precise focus
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1230k230kCrisper display (+1000k dot)

Common features in the Olympus VG-110 and Ricoh GR

 VG-110 GR 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch display Lacking Touch display

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus VG-110 enjoys exterior dimensions of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs) and the Ricoh GR has sizing of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).

Examine the Olympus VG-110 and Ricoh GR in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the VG-110 versus the GR.

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GR size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the VG-110 and GR is 97 and 90 respectively.

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GR top view buttons comparison

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is very tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reviewing technical specs. The pic below might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the VG-110 and GR.

As you have seen, each of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The VG-110 having a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Ricoh GR will offer you greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged VG-110 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GR sensor size comparison

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GR Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VG-110 Portrait photography info
Ricoh GR Portrait photography info
26
supports face detection autofocus
no manual focus
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
low MP (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
74
focusing manually
flash sync is higher than normal (1/4,000 seconds)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus VG-110 Street photography advice
Ricoh GR Street photography advice
48
fixed screen
no image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
74
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
lighter than competition in class (245g)
great high ISO (25,600)
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus VG-110 Sports photography advice
Ricoh GR Sports photography advice
24
supports tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
low MP (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
bad battery power (170 shots)
no phase detect autofocus
45
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
low frames per second (4.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus VG-110
Travel photography with Ricoh GR
57
has built in flash
decently wide (27mm)
missing Timelapse function
bad battery power (170 shots)
low MP (12 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
71
lighter than competition in class (245g)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus VG-110
Landscape photography with Ricoh GR
27
decently wide (27mm)
no manual focus
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
lack of manual mode
no image stabilization
low MP (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
bad battery power (170 CIPA)
missing Timelapse function
61
focusing manually
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
great high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW files
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VG-110 Vlogging features
Ricoh GR Vlogging features
28
decently wide (27mm)
supports face detection autofocus
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pxls)
missing external microphone jack
30
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition in class (245g)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
does not have external mic support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GR Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VG-110 and Ricoh GR
 Olympus VG-110Ricoh GR
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus VG-110 Ricoh GR
Category Ultracompact Large Sensor Compact
Released 2011-02-08 2013-04-17
Physical type Ultracompact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.7 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 372.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest Possible resolution 3968 x 2976 4928 x 3264
Maximum native ISO 1600 25600
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 27-108mm (4.0x) 28mm (1x)
Maximum aperture f/2.9-6.5 f/2.8
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dots 1,230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen technology TFT Color LCD TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (optional)
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4s 300s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter rate - 4.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 4.70 m 5.40 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize - 1/4000s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4 MPEG-4
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 105 grams (0.23 lbs) 245 grams (0.54 lbs)
Physical dimensions 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 78
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.6
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 13.5
DXO Low light score not tested 972
Other
Battery life 170 photographs 290 photographs
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model LI-70B DB65
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC SD, SDHC, SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Pricing at release $150 $971