Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GR Digital III
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Launched February 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Launched July 2009
- Updated by Ricoh GR Digital IV
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GR Digital III, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the VG-110 (12MP) and the GR Digital III (10MP) is pretty comparable but the VG-110 (1/2.3") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") come with different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe VG-110 was announced 19 months after the GR Digital III which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the VG-110 scores versus the GR Digital III in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VG-110 and Ricoh GR Digital III. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus VG-110 Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
VG-110 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2011 | July 2009 | Newer by 19 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Olympus VG-110
GR Digital III | VG-110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-110 and Ricoh GR Digital III
VG-110 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus VG-110 provides outside dimensions of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") having a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR Digital III has measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Examine the Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GR Digital III in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are working with at that moment. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the VG-110 and the GR Digital III.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the VG-110 and GR Digital III is 97 and 92 respectively.
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to picture the gap in sensor dimensions just by seeing specs. The picture below should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the VG-110 and GR Digital III.
All in all, the two cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The VG-110 with its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF more challenging and the Olympus VG-110 will provide extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The younger VG-110 provides an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications
Olympus VG-110 | Ricoh GR Digital III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus VG-110 | Ricoh GR Digital III |
Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2011-02-08 | 2009-07-27 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/1.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 1s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 105g (0.23 lb) | 208g (0.46 lb) |
Dimensions | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 170 photos | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-70B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $150 | $399 |