Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29


92 Imaging
34 Features
47 Overall
39
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Introduced February 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Introduced September 2011
- Superseded the Ricoh GR Digital III

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Olympus VG-110 and Ricoh GR Digital IV, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the VG-110 (12MP) and the GR Digital IV (10MP) is fairly similar but the VG-110 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") boast different sensor measurements.

The VG-110 was unveiled 7 months before the GR Digital IV which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a complete comparison, here is a concise overview of how the VG-110 grades against the GR Digital IV in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VG-110 & Ricoh GR Digital IV. The full galleries are provided at Olympus VG-110 Gallery & Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
VG-110 | GR Digital IV |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Olympus VG-110
GR Digital IV | VG-110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2011 | ![]() | February 2011 | Fresher by 7 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-110 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
VG-110 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus VG-110 comes with outside dimensions of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") having a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR Digital IV has sizing of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Examine the Olympus VG-110 and Ricoh GR Digital IV in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the VG-110 and the GR Digital IV.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the VG-110 and GR Digital IV is 97 and 92 respectively.

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing just by reviewing a spec sheet. The visual here will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the VG-110 and GR Digital IV.
As you can see, both cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The VG-110 having a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Olympus VG-110 will offer you more detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The older VG-110 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Olympus VG-110 | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus VG-110 | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2011-02-08 | 2011-09-15 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/1.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 105 gr (0.23 lb) | 190 gr (0.42 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 170 photos | 390 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-70B | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $150 | $599 |