Clicky

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

Portability
97
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29
Olympus VG-110 front
 
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front
Portability
77
Imaging
52
Features
31
Overall
43

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs

Olympus VG-110
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
  • Released February 2011
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 50mm (F2.5) lens
  • 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
  • Launched November 2009
Photography Glossary

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview

On this page, we are contrasting the Olympus VG-110 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the VG-110 (12MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) is very comparable but the VG-110 (1/2.3") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) offer different sensor sizing.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The VG-110 was introduced 16 months later than the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro making them a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the VG-110 grades against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 VG-110 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
LaunchedFebruary 2011November 2009Fresher by 16 months

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Olympus VG-110

 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro VG-110 
Manually focus More precise focus
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution920k230kCrisper display (+690k dot)

Common features in the Olympus VG-110 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 VG-110 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly display Missing Touch friendly display

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to carry your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus VG-110 provides exterior dimensions of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") along with a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).

Check out the Olympus VG-110 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the VG-110 vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VG-110 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 97 and 77 respectively.

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro top view buttons comparison

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison

Typically, its tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing just by seeing specs. The graphic underneath should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the VG-110 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

All in all, both cameras provide the same megapixel count but different sensor sizing. The VG-110 offers the smaller sensor which should make achieving shallower depth of field tougher. The fresher VG-110 should have an edge with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro sensor size comparison

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VG-110 Portrait photography features
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Portrait photography features
26
has face detection focus
no manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
low MP (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
55
manual focus
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
does not have liveview
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus VG-110 Street photography details
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Street photography details
48
fixed screen
no image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
62
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Olympus VG-110 Sports photography info
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sports photography info
24
has tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
not so great battery (170 per charge)
no phase detect auto focus
32
sensor size is good (APS-C)
can't change focal length (50mm)
does not have liveview
slow fps (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (12MP)
terrible battery (320 per charge)
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus VG-110 Travel photography details
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Travel photography details
57
has built in flash
decently wide (27mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
not so great battery (170 CIPA)
low MP (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
49
flash built-in
terrible battery (320 per charge)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VG-110 Landscape photography factors
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Landscape photography factors
27
decently wide (27mm)
no manual focus
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
small screen (2.7 inches)
no manual control
no image stabilization
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
not so great battery (170 shots)
lack of Time Lapse recording
46
manual focus
screen size is decent (3 inches)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (50mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
does not have liveview
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
terrible battery (320 CIPA)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VG-110 Vlogging details
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Vlogging details
28
decently wide (27mm)
has face detection focus
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
display is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of external mic support
20
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have microphone jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VG-110 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
 Olympus VG-110Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus VG-110 Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
Category Ultracompact Advanced Mirrorless
Released 2011-02-08 2009-11-10
Body design Ultracompact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III GR engine III
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3968 x 2976 4288 x 2848
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 200
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 27-108mm (4.0x) 50mm (1x)
Maximal aperture f/2.9-6.5 f/2.5
Macro focusing distance 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7" 3"
Screen resolution 230k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 180 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/3200 secs
Continuous shooting speed - 3.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 4.70 m 3.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4 Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 105 grams (0.23 lbs) 453 grams (1.00 lbs)
Physical dimensions 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 170 images 320 images
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID LI-70B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $150 $566