Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29


77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Released February 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Launched November 2009

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Olympus VG-110 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the VG-110 (12MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) is very comparable but the VG-110 (1/2.3") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) offer different sensor sizing.

The VG-110 was introduced 16 months later than the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro making them a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the VG-110 grades against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VG-110 & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus VG-110 Gallery & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
VG-110 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2011 | ![]() | November 2009 | Fresher by 16 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Olympus VG-110
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | VG-110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-110 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
VG-110 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus VG-110 provides exterior dimensions of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") along with a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Check out the Olympus VG-110 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the VG-110 vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VG-110 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 97 and 77 respectively.

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing just by seeing specs. The graphic underneath should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the VG-110 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
All in all, both cameras provide the same megapixel count but different sensor sizing. The VG-110 offers the smaller sensor which should make achieving shallower depth of field tougher. The fresher VG-110 should have an edge with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Olympus VG-110 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus VG-110 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Category | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2011-02-08 | 2009-11-10 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 2848 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/2.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 180 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/3200 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 105 grams (0.23 lbs) | 453 grams (1.00 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 170 images | 320 images |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-70B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $150 | $566 |