Clicky

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

Portability
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Olympus VG-110 front
 
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
Portability
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs

Olympus VG-110
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
  • Launched February 2011
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Announced March 2010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview

Lets take a more detailed look at the Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the VG-110 (12MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) is fairly well matched but the VG-110 (1/2.3") and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") enjoy totally different sensor sizing.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The VG-110 was manufactured 11 months after the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC which means that they are of a similar generation. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief overview of how the VG-110 scores against the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

		

		

			
 VG-110 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
AnnouncedFebruary 2011March 2010Newer by 11 months
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Olympus VG-110

		

		

			
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC VG-110 
Manually focus  Very accurate focusing
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution920k230kCrisper display (+690k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Olympus VG-110 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

		

		

			
 VG-110 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen  Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly display  Lack of Touch friendly display
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison

		

		

			
In case you're intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus VG-110 provides physical dimensions of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") with a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has sizing of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") having a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Look at the Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the VG-110 vs the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC size comparison
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VG-110 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 97 and 85 respectively.
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Quite often, its difficult to envision the gap between sensor dimensions purely by reading through specs. The pic underneath may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the VG-110 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The VG-110 featuring a tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Olympus VG-110 will give greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics far more aggressively. The fresher VG-110 will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
	
			Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Olympus VG-110
Portrait photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
26
 features face detect autofocus
 no manual focus
 manual mode not available
 can't use external flash
 sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 has no RAW support
36
 has manual focus
 saves RAW files
 no liveview feature
 low megapixels (10 megapixels)
 sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Street Comparison
Olympus VG-110 Street photography advice
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Street photography advice
48
 screen does not articulate
 does not have image stabilization
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 has no RAW support
65
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 saves RAW files
 lighter than competition (355g)
 no articulating screen
 sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Sports Comparison
Sports photography with Olympus VG-110
Sports photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
24
 features tracking focus
 no shutter priority mode
 does not have image stabilization
 sensor resolution low (12MP)
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 low battery pack (170 CIPA)
 has no phase detect autofocus
25
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 no liveview feature
 very slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames/s)
 low megapixels (10 megapixels)
 sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
 does not have phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary
Travel Comparison
Travel photography with Olympus VG-110
Travel photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
57
 has built in flash
 decently wide (27mm)
 does not have Timelapse recording
 low battery pack (170 per charge)
 sensor resolution low (12MP)
 does not have selfie friendly display
 sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
60
 lighter than competition (355 grams)
 flash built-in
 really wide (24mm)
 low megapixels (10 megapixels)
 doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
 sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Landscape Comparison
Olympus VG-110 Landscape photography details
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Landscape photography details
27
 decently wide (27mm)
 no manual focus
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
 screen is somewhat small (2.7")
 manual mode not available
 does not have image stabilization
 sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 has no RAW support
 low battery pack (170 per charge)
 does not have Timelapse recording
47
 has manual focus
 really wide (24mm)
 screen size is good (3")
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 saves RAW files
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
 no liveview feature
 low megapixels (10MP)
 sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Vlogging Comparison
 Olympus VG-110 as a Vlogging camera
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Vlogging camera
28
 decently wide (27mm)
 features face detect autofocus
 sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
 does not have selfie friendly display
 does not have image stabilization
 low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
 does not have microphone port
28
 really wide (24mm)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than competition (355 grams)
 sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
 doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
 low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
 no microphone jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	

		

			
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VG-110 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
 Olympus VG-110Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
General Information
Company Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus VG-110 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Type Ultracompact Advanced Mirrorless
Launched 2011-02-08 2010-03-18
Body design Ultracompact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9
Highest resolution 3968 x 2976 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW format    
Autofocusing
Manual focus    
Autofocus touch    
Continuous autofocus    
Autofocus single    
Tracking autofocus    
Selective autofocus    
Center weighted autofocus    
Autofocus multi area    
Autofocus live view    
Face detection autofocus    
Contract detection autofocus    
Phase detection autofocus    
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 27-108mm (4.0x) 24-72mm (3.0x)
Max aperture f/2.9-6.5 f/2.5-4.4
Macro focus distance 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 4.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch capability    
Screen tech TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 seconds 180 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed - 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manually set exposure    
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance    
Image stabilization    
Inbuilt flash    
Flash range 4.70 m 4.50 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe    
Auto exposure bracketing    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment    
Average    
Spot    
Partial    
AF area    
Center weighted    
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video format MPEG-4 Motion JPEG
Microphone input    
Headphone input    
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal    
Water proof    
Dust proof    
Shock proof    
Crush proof    
Freeze proof    
Weight 105 gr (0.23 lb) 355 gr (0.78 lb)
Dimensions 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 170 photographs 410 photographs
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model LI-70B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse recording    
Type of storage SD/SDHC SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch price $150 $349