Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh WG-4
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Launched February 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Olympus VG-110 and Ricoh WG-4, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the VG-110 (12MP) and WG-4 (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe VG-110 was brought out 4 years before the WG-4 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a short summary of how the VG-110 grades against the WG-4 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VG-110 & Ricoh WG-4. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus VG-110 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Ricoh WG-4
| VG-110 | WG-4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Olympus VG-110
| WG-4 | VG-110 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 | February 2011 | More modern by 36 months | |
| Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-110 and Ricoh WG-4
| VG-110 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VG-110 enjoys outside dimensions of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 has dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Look at the Olympus VG-110 and Ricoh WG-4 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the VG-110 vs the WG-4.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the VG-110 and WG-4 is 97 and 90 respectively.
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to see the contrast between sensor sizes purely by checking specifications. The image underneath might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the VG-110 and WG-4.
To sum up, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Ricoh WG-4 to give extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged VG-110 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Olympus VG-110 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus VG-110 | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2011-02-08 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4 | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 105g (0.23 lb) | 230g (0.51 lb) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 170 photos | 240 photos |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-70B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $150 | $330 |