Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Introduced February 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
- Renewed by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Lets look closer at the Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There is a huge difference among the sensor resolutions of the VG-110 (12MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe VG-110 was revealed 4 years before the WG-4 GPS which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a in depth comparison, here is a quick view of how the VG-110 scores vs the WG-4 GPS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VG-110 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus VG-110 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
VG-110 | WG-4 GPS |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Olympus VG-110
WG-4 GPS | VG-110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2014 | February 2011 | Newer by 36 months | |
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-110 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
VG-110 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither contains Touch display |
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus VG-110 has got outer dimensions of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") and a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has sizing of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
See the Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the VG-110 versus the WG-4 GPS.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the VG-110 and WG-4 GPS is 97 and 90 respectively.
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to picture the difference in sensor dimensions only by viewing technical specs. The picture underneath should give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the VG-110 and WG-4 GPS.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size but different MP. You should expect to see the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to provide you with more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics way more aggressively. The more aged VG-110 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
Olympus VG-110 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus VG-110 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2011-02-08 | 2014-02-05 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 105 gr (0.23 pounds) | 235 gr (0.52 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 170 shots | 240 shots |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-70B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $150 | $210 |