Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh WG-M1
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Announced February 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Introduced September 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
The following is a comprehensive comparison of the Olympus VG-110 and Ricoh WG-M1, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the VG-110 (12MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras offer the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe VG-110 was manufactured 4 years before the WG-M1 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a full comparison, here is a quick view of how the VG-110 grades vs the WG-M1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VG-110 & Ricoh WG-M1. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus VG-110 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| VG-110 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 2.7" | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.2") | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 115k | Crisper screen (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Olympus VG-110
| WG-M1 | VG-110 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2014 | February 2011 | Newer by 43 months |
Common features in the Olympus VG-110 and Ricoh WG-M1
| VG-110 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | No manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus VG-110 provides external measurements of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") and a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has specifications of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Examine the Olympus VG-110 and Ricoh WG-M1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is a front view scale comparison of the VG-110 versus the WG-M1.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VG-110 and WG-M1 is 97 and 91 respectively.
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions merely by going through specs. The image here may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the VG-110 and WG-M1.
All in all, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You can expect the Ricoh WG-M1 to produce extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged VG-110 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Olympus VG-110 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus VG-110 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2011-02-08 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | (1×) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7" | 1.5" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 115 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4 | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 105g (0.23 lb) | 190g (0.42 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 170 photos | 350 photos |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-70B | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $150 | $2,000 |