Olympus VG-110 vs Samsung SL202
97 Imaging
36 Features
20 Overall
29
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Olympus VG-110 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Introduced February 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Additionally Known as PL50
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Olympus VG-110 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Below is a thorough assessment of the Olympus VG-110 vs Samsung SL202, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the VG-110 (12MP) and the SL202 (10MP) is very well matched and they come with the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe VG-110 was introduced 2 years later than the SL202 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple summation of how the VG-110 grades vs the SL202 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus VG-110 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VG-110 & Samsung SL202. The whole galleries are available at Olympus VG-110 Gallery & Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Samsung SL202
| VG-110 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2011 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 25 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Olympus VG-110
| SL202 | VG-110 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus VG-110 and Samsung SL202
| VG-110 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equivalent display sizing |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Olympus VG-110 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus VG-110 enjoys outer measurements of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") and a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL202 has sizing of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the Olympus VG-110 vs Samsung SL202 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have during that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the VG-110 against the SL202.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VG-110 and SL202 is 97 and 94 respectively.
Olympus VG-110 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to envision the gap between sensor measurements only by checking specifications. The visual underneath will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the VG-110 and SL202.
To sum up, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Olympus VG-110 to resolve extra detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images far more aggressively. The more modern VG-110 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus VG-110 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus VG-110 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Olympus VG-110 | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus VG-110 | Samsung SL202 |
| Also Known as | - | PL50 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2011-02-08 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 105 gr (0.23 lb) | 168 gr (0.37 lb) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 170 shots | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-70B | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $150 | $140 |
