Clicky

Olympus VG-110 vs Samsung WB50F

Portability
97
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29
Olympus VG-110 front
 
Samsung WB50F front
Portability
92
Imaging
40
Features
36
Overall
38

Olympus VG-110 vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs

Olympus VG-110
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
  • Introduced February 2011
Samsung WB50F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
  • Introduced January 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus VG-110 vs Samsung WB50F Overview

Below is a in depth analysis of the Olympus VG-110 vs Samsung WB50F, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the VG-110 (12MP) and WB50F (16MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Photography Glossary

The VG-110 was brought out 3 years earlier than the WB50F and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB50F being a Compact camera.

Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a short highlight of how the VG-110 grades versus the WB50F for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Samsung WB50F

 VG-110 WB50F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Olympus VG-110

 WB50F VG-110 
IntroducedJanuary 2014February 2011More recent by 35 months
Focus manually More exact focusing
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kSharper display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Olympus VG-110 and Samsung WB50F

 VG-110 WB50F 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch display Neither contains Touch display

Olympus VG-110 vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison

For those who are going to lug around your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus VG-110 has got physical measurements of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs) and the Samsung WB50F has proportions of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).

Check the Olympus VG-110 vs Samsung WB50F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at that moment. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the VG-110 vs the WB50F.

Olympus VG-110 vs Samsung WB50F size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the VG-110 and WB50F is 97 and 92 respectively.

Olympus VG-110 vs Samsung WB50F top view buttons comparison

Olympus VG-110 vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be hard to envision the contrast in sensor measurements just by viewing technical specs. The photograph here will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the VG-110 and WB50F.

As you can tell, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Samsung WB50F to render extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos more aggressively. The older VG-110 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus VG-110 vs Samsung WB50F sensor size comparison

Olympus VG-110 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VG-110 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VG-110 Portrait photography features
Samsung WB50F Portrait photography features
26
features face detect autofocus
lack of manual focus
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
low resolution (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
37
manual focus
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus VG-110 Street photography details
Samsung WB50F Street photography details
48
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
62
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (207 grams)
screen is fixed
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Olympus VG-110 Sports photography advice
Samsung WB50F Sports photography advice
24
features tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
low resolution (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
low battery power (170 shots)
no phase detect autofocus
40
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus VG-110
Travel photography with Samsung WB50F
57
flash built-in
decently wide (27mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
low battery power (170 shots)
low resolution (12MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
69
lighter than competitors in class (207 grams)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (24mm)
long zoom (288mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VG-110 Landscape photography factors
Samsung WB50F Landscape photography factors
27
decently wide (27mm)
lack of manual focus
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
lack of manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
low resolution (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
low battery power (170 shots)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
47
manual focus
rather wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
lack of manual mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
lack of Timelapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VG-110 Vlogging highlights
Samsung WB50F Vlogging highlights
28
decently wide (27mm)
features face detect autofocus
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have mic port
30
rather wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (207g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external microphone socket
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus VG-110 vs Samsung WB50F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VG-110 and Samsung WB50F
 Olympus VG-110Samsung WB50F
General Information
Company Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus VG-110 Samsung WB50F
Type Ultracompact Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2011-02-08 2014-01-07
Physical type Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 3968 x 2976 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 80 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 27-108mm (4.0x) 24-288mm (12.0x)
Max aperture f/2.9-6.5 f/3.1-6.3
Macro focus range 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs -
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 4.70 m -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in -
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 1280 x 720
Max video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4 -
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 105 grams (0.23 lb) 207 grams (0.46 lb)
Physical dimensions 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 170 photographs -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model LI-70B BP70A
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) -
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Card slots One One
Launch cost $150 $180