Olympus VG-110 vs Samsung WB50F
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29


92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
Olympus VG-110 vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Introduced February 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Introduced January 2014

Olympus VG-110 vs Samsung WB50F Overview
Below is a in depth analysis of the Olympus VG-110 vs Samsung WB50F, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the VG-110 (12MP) and WB50F (16MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

The VG-110 was brought out 3 years earlier than the WB50F and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB50F being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a short highlight of how the VG-110 grades versus the WB50F for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus VG-110 vs Samsung WB50F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VG-110 & Samsung WB50F. The entire galleries are available at Olympus VG-110 Gallery & Samsung WB50F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Samsung WB50F
VG-110 | WB50F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Olympus VG-110
WB50F | VG-110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2014 | ![]() | February 2011 | More recent by 35 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-110 and Samsung WB50F
VG-110 | WB50F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch display |
Olympus VG-110 vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus VG-110 has got physical measurements of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs) and the Samsung WB50F has proportions of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).
Check the Olympus VG-110 vs Samsung WB50F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at that moment. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the VG-110 vs the WB50F.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the VG-110 and WB50F is 97 and 92 respectively.

Olympus VG-110 vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to envision the contrast in sensor measurements just by viewing technical specs. The photograph here will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the VG-110 and WB50F.
As you can tell, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Samsung WB50F to render extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos more aggressively. The older VG-110 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus VG-110 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VG-110 vs Samsung WB50F Specifications
Olympus VG-110 | Samsung WB50F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus VG-110 | Samsung WB50F |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2011-02-08 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 105 grams (0.23 lb) | 207 grams (0.46 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 170 photographs | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-70B | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $150 | $180 |