Olympus VG-110 vs Sony A290
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/28610/28610d92a1bc9db50c39d8fc3686aeec0604eb40" alt="Olympus VG-110 front Olympus VG-110 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0798d/0798ddacd7eeb1289b58370a77a8d66bd4ccddbb" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 front"
66 Imaging
54 Features
47 Overall
51
Olympus VG-110 vs Sony A290 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Introduced February 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Older Model is Sony A230
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus VG-110 vs Sony A290 Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Olympus VG-110 and Sony A290, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the VG-110 (12MP) and the A290 (14MP) is relatively similar but the VG-110 (1/2.3") and A290 (APS-C) come with different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The VG-110 was brought out 9 months later than the A290 so they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony A290 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a simple summation of how the VG-110 matches up against the A290 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus VG-110 vs Sony A290 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VG-110 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A290. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus VG-110 Gallery and Sony A290 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Sony A290
VG-110 | A290 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2011 | ![]() | June 2010 | Fresher by 9 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A290 over the Olympus VG-110
A290 | VG-110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus VG-110 and Sony A290
VG-110 | A290 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Identical screen sizing |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus VG-110 vs Sony A290 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera frequently, you will want to factor its weight and size. The Olympus VG-110 enjoys external dimensions of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") and a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs) while the Sony A290 has specifications of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") along with a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
Check the Olympus VG-110 and Sony A290 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose at that time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the VG-110 compared to the A290.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1eaa8/1eaa8eda3529f56a1b51465903691856b74d8a19" alt="Olympus VG-110 vs Sony A290 size comparison Olympus VG-110 vs Sony A290 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VG-110 and A290 is 97 and 66 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ef01/8ef014f783d701293a51ae9cdba2a25d0d002f4b" alt="Olympus VG-110 vs Sony A290 top view buttons comparison Olympus VG-110 vs Sony A290 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VG-110 vs Sony A290 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizing purely by going over a spec sheet. The photograph here might offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the VG-110 and A290.
Clearly, each of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The VG-110 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF trickier and the Sony A290 will deliver more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots much more aggressively. The newer VG-110 provides an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a269/5a269ba2639282990b82f5f484325e0c7009f75d" alt="Olympus VG-110 vs Sony A290 sensor size comparison Olympus VG-110 vs Sony A290 sensor size comparison"
Olympus VG-110 vs Sony A290 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9eb05/9eb05cc908454f0185f8b4ec3338523c89a403af" alt="Olympus VG-110 vs Sony A290 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VG-110 vs Sony A290 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus VG-110 vs Sony A290 Specifications
Olympus VG-110 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus VG-110 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 |
Category | Ultracompact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2011-02-08 | 2010-06-09 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4592 x 3056 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 105 grams (0.23 lb) | 549 grams (1.21 lb) |
Dimensions | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 66 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 615 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 170 pictures | 290 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-70B | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo, SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $150 | $600 |