Olympus VG-110 vs Sony HX200V
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
66 Imaging
42 Features
55 Overall
47
Olympus VG-110 vs Sony HX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Announced February 2011
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 27-810mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 583g - 122 x 87 x 93mm
- Launched May 2012
- Superseded the Sony HX100V
- Replacement is Sony HX300
Olympus VG-110 vs Sony HX200V Overview
The following is a in depth comparison of the Olympus VG-110 versus Sony HX200V, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the VG-110 (12MP) and HX200V (18MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe VG-110 was brought out 15 months before the HX200V which makes them a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony HX200V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving straight to a complete comparison, here is a concise view of how the VG-110 grades versus the HX200V in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus VG-110 vs Sony HX200V Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VG-110 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus VG-110 Gallery & Sony HX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Sony HX200V
VG-110 | HX200V |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX200V over the Olympus VG-110
HX200V | VG-110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2012 | February 2011 | Newer by 15 months | |
Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 230k | Clearer screen (+692k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-110 and Sony HX200V
VG-110 | HX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Olympus VG-110 vs Sony HX200V Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus VG-110 comes with outer dimensions of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") having a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs) whilst the Sony HX200V has measurements of 122mm x 87mm x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") and a weight of 583 grams (1.29 lbs).
Compare the Olympus VG-110 versus Sony HX200V in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have during that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the VG-110 against the HX200V.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the VG-110 and HX200V is 97 and 66 respectively.
Olympus VG-110 vs Sony HX200V Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to envision the difference in sensor dimensions only by seeing specs. The image below will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the VG-110 and HX200V.
All in all, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Sony HX200V to show more detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged VG-110 will be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus VG-110 vs Sony HX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VG-110 vs Sony HX200V Specifications
Olympus VG-110 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus VG-110 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2011-02-08 | 2012-05-11 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 27-810mm (30.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 922k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 12.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 105g (0.23 lbs) | 583g (1.29 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 122 x 87 x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 170 photos | 450 photos |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-70B | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $150 | $480 |