Olympus VG-110 vs Sony HX300
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
63 Imaging
44 Features
51 Overall
46
Olympus VG-110 vs Sony HX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Released February 2011
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
- Introduced February 2013
- Previous Model is Sony HX200V
- Refreshed by Sony HX400V
Olympus VG-110 vs Sony HX300 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Olympus VG-110 versus Sony HX300, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the VG-110 (12MP) and HX300 (20MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe VG-110 was manufactured 24 months prior to the HX300 making them a generation away from one another. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony HX300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the VG-110 scores vs the HX300 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus VG-110 vs Sony HX300 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VG-110 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus VG-110 Gallery & Sony HX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Sony HX300
VG-110 | HX300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Olympus VG-110
HX300 | VG-110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2013 | February 2011 | Newer by 24 months | |
Focus manually | Dial precise focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Crisper display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-110 and Sony HX300
VG-110 | HX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Olympus VG-110 vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus VG-110 comes with outer measurements of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") and a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs) while the Sony HX300 has proportions of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") and a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).
Compare the Olympus VG-110 versus Sony HX300 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the VG-110 against the HX300.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VG-110 and HX300 is 97 and 63 respectively.
Olympus VG-110 vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by going through a spec sheet. The image here may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the VG-110 and HX300.
As you can see, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size but different resolution. You can anticipate the Sony HX300 to produce more detail due to its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics way more aggressively. The more aged VG-110 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus VG-110 vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VG-110 vs Sony HX300 Specifications
Olympus VG-110 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus VG-110 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 |
Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2011-02-08 | 2013-02-20 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/2.8-6.3 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 105g (0.23 lb) | 623g (1.37 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 170 photographs | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-70B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC | - |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $150 | $339 |