Olympus VG-110 vs Sony T900
97 Imaging
36 Features
20 Overall
29
96 Imaging
35 Features
30 Overall
33
Olympus VG-110 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Revealed February 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Released February 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus VG-110 vs Sony T900 Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Olympus VG-110 vs Sony T900, both Ultracompact cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the VG-110 (12MP) and the T900 (12MP) is very comparable and they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe VG-110 was revealed 2 years later than the T900 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before diving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a short summary of how the VG-110 matches up vs the T900 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus VG-110 vs Sony T900 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VG-110 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The full galleries are provided at Olympus VG-110 Gallery and Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Sony T900
| VG-110 | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2011 |  | February 2009 | Fresher by 25 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Olympus VG-110
| T900 | VG-110 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Display sizing | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+692k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VG-110 and Sony T900
| VG-110 | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus VG-110 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus VG-110 has got physical measurements of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") having a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs) while the Sony T900 has sizing of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus VG-110 vs Sony T900 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the VG-110 compared to the T900.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the VG-110 and T900 is 97 and 96 respectively.
Olympus VG-110 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to picture the difference in sensor sizing simply by going through technical specs. The graphic below might give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the VG-110 and T900.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same MP and you should expect comparable quality of photographs although you would want to take the release date of the cameras into account. The younger VG-110 provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus VG-110 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus VG-110 vs Sony T900 Specifications
| Olympus VG-110 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus VG-110 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2011-02-08 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3.5" |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 922k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 2 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 105 grams (0.23 lbs) | 143 grams (0.32 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 170 photographs | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-70B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $150 | $300 |
