Olympus VG-120 vs Olympus VR-330
96 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
Olympus VG-120 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced February 2011
- Superseded the Olympus VR-320
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus VG-120 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
Here, we are evaluating the Olympus VG-120 versus Olympus VR-330, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are manufactured by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the VG-120 (14MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe VG-120 was announced at a similar time to the VR-330 and they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VG-120 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a in depth comparison, here is a brief summation of how the VG-120 scores versus the VR-330 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus VG-120 vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VG-120 & Olympus VR-330. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus VG-120 Gallery & Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-120 over the Olympus VR-330
| VG-120 | VR-330 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Olympus VG-120
| VR-330 | VG-120 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-120 and Olympus VR-330
| VG-120 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2011 | February 2011 | Same age | |
| Manual focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus VG-120 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus VG-120 has outer dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs) and the Olympus VR-330 has sizing of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus VG-120 versus Olympus VR-330 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the VG-120 and the VR-330.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the VG-120 and VR-330 is 96 and 94 respectively.
Olympus VG-120 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizes just by checking out specs. The image below should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the VG-120 and VR-330.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same exact megapixels and you can expect comparable quality of photographs but you need to consider the launch date of the cameras into account.
Olympus VG-120 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus VG-120 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
| Olympus VG-120 | Olympus VR-330 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus VG-120 | Olympus VR-330 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2011-01-06 | 2011-02-08 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.40 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 120 gr (0.26 lb) | 158 gr (0.35 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 160 images | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-70B | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $190 | $220 |