Olympus VG-120 vs Pentax K200D
96 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
61 Imaging
49 Features
41 Overall
45
Olympus VG-120 vs Pentax K200D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 690g - 134 x 95 x 74mm
- Launched September 2008
- Superseded the Pentax K100D S
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus VG-120 vs Pentax K200D Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Olympus VG-120 and Pentax K200D, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Pentax. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the VG-120 (14MP) and K200D (10MP) and the VG-120 (1/2.3") and K200D (APS-C) offer different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe VG-120 was brought out 2 years later than the K200D and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus VG-120 being a Ultracompact camera and the Pentax K200D being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the VG-120 scores against the K200D for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus VG-120 vs Pentax K200D Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VG-120 & Pentax K200D. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus VG-120 Gallery & Pentax K200D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-120 over the Pentax K200D
| VG-120 | K200D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2011 | September 2008 | Fresher by 29 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Pentax K200D over the Olympus VG-120
| K200D | VG-120 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus VG-120 and Pentax K200D
| VG-120 | K200D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Olympus VG-120 vs Pentax K200D Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus VG-120 enjoys physical dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs) whilst the Pentax K200D has measurements of 134mm x 95mm x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") with a weight of 690 grams (1.52 lbs).
Check the Olympus VG-120 and Pentax K200D in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the VG-120 vs the K200D.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the VG-120 and K200D is 96 and 61 respectively.
Olympus VG-120 vs Pentax K200D Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to visualize the gap in sensor sizing just by researching specs. The graphic here should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the VG-120 and K200D.
All in all, both the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The VG-120 due to its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF tougher and the Olympus VG-120 will render greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The newer VG-120 should have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus VG-120 vs Pentax K200D Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus VG-120 vs Pentax K200D Specifications
| Olympus VG-120 | Pentax K200D | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus VG-120 | Pentax K200D |
| Class | Ultracompact | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Launched | 2011-01-06 | 2008-09-01 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 151 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.40 m | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 120 gr (0.26 lb) | 690 gr (1.52 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 134 x 95 x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 64 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 561 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 160 photographs | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-70B | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $190 | $600 |